Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing

被引:78
作者
Ahsan, Ahmad [2 ]
Pages, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Inter Amer Dev Bank, Res Dept, Washington, DC USA
[2] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
Employment protection legislation; Dispute resolution legislation; Manufacturing; Employment; India; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taking advantage of variation across Indian states in labor reforms, this paper studies the economic effects of labor dispute resolution legislation (DL) and employment protection legislation (EPL) in the manufacturing sector. We find that laws that increase the cost of dispute resolution or employment protection substantially reduce registered sector employment and output, although the cost of industrial dispute regulation on output is larger. There is evidence of strong complementarities on labor laws: The output or employment costs of EPL are larger in states and periods where it is more difficult to resolve disputes, and not very important when such costs are low. Workers do not benefit from EPL or DL, as they do not increase the labor share or the wage bill, although EPL has a small positive effect on earnings per worker. Labor-intensive industries, such as textiles, are the hardest hit by amendments that increase employment protection while capital-intensive industries are the most affected by laws that increase the cost of labor dispute resolution. Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (1) (2009) 62-75. The World Bank, Washington, USA; Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, USA. (C) 2008 Association for Comparative Economic Studies. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 75
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Ahsan Ahmad., 2008, Globalization, Labor Markets and Inequality in India
[2]   Enforcement of labor regulation and firm size [J].
Almeida, Rita ;
Carneiro, Pedro .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2009, 37 (01) :28-46
[3]   Labor regulation and employment in India's retail stores [J].
Amin, Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2009, 37 (01) :47-61
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 9879 NBER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Employment outlook 1999
[6]   Does employment protection reduce productivity? Evidence from US states [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Kerr, William R. ;
Kugler, Adriana D. .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 117 (521) :F189-F217
[7]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[8]   Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India [J].
Besley, T ;
Burgess, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :91-134
[9]  
BHATTACHARJEA A, 2006, 141 DELH SCH EC CTR
[10]   The regulation of labor [J].
Botero, JC ;
Djankov, S ;
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (04) :1339-1382