Do positive resection margins after ablative surgery for head and neck cancer adversely affect prognosis? A study of 352 patients with recurrent carcinoma following radiotherapy treated by salvage surgery

被引:98
作者
Jones, AS
Hanafi, ZB
Nadapalan, V
Roland, NJ
Kinsella, A
Helliwell, TR
机构
[1] UNIV LIVERPOOL,ROYAL LIVERPOOL HOSP,DEPT SURG,LIVERPOOL L69 3BX,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV LIVERPOOL,ROYAL LIVERPOOL HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,LIVERPOOL L69 3BX,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
关键词
head and neck squamous carcinoma; recurrence; positive resection margin; incomplete excision; residual tumour;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1996.327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
It is generally accepted by surgeons that failure to eradicate malignant disease at the primary site has an adverse effect on survival. The present study investigates 352 patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck treated by primary radical radiotherapy and who subsequently underwent surgical ablation for a recurrent carcinoma. A total of 303 (86%) patients had a negative resection margin and 49 (14%) had a positive resection margin. Oral carcinoma was 1.7 times more likely to be associated with a positive margin than other tumours (P = 0.0292). Actuarial calculations demonstrated that 47% of patients with negative margins and 66% of patients with positive margins developed a primary site recurrence (P = 0.0286), Neck node recurrence occurred in 10% of those patients with negative margins and 12% of patients with positive margins. Patients with positive margins had a significantly poorer survival than those with negative margins (P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis failed to confirm any independent adverse effect from a positive margin. The 5 year tumour-specific survival of patients with a positive margin was poorer by 12% than for those patients with a negative margin. The pattern of failure differed between the two groups, with patients having positive margins tending to die of local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE P, 1987, STAT METHODS MED RES, P421
[2]   SUPRAGLOTTIC SURGERY OF LARYNX [J].
BOCCA, E ;
PIGNATARO, O ;
MOSCIARO, O .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1968, 77 (06) :1005-+
[3]   PROGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC VALUE OF FROZEN SECTION DETERMINATIONS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF HEAD AND NECK [J].
BYERS, RM ;
BLAND, KI ;
BORLASE, B ;
LUNA, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1978, 136 (04) :525-528
[4]   THE CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN SURGICALLY RESECTED MARGINS OF THE PRIMARY TUMOR IN HEAD AND NECK-CARCINOMA [J].
CHEN, TY ;
EMRICH, LJ ;
DRISCOLL, DL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1987, 13 (06) :833-837
[5]   IMPLICATIONS OF TUMOR IN RESECTION MARGINS FOLLOWING SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK [J].
COOK, JA ;
JONES, AS ;
PHILLIPS, DE ;
LLUCH, ES .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :37-41
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   THE QUESTIONABLE VALUE OF TOTAL GLOSSECTOMY [J].
HARRISON, D .
HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1983, 6 (02) :632-638
[9]  
HERMANEK P, 1992, UICC TNM CLASSIFICAT
[10]  
LEE JG, 1974, T AM ACAD OPHTHALMOL, V78, P49