Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:595
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[2]   ACTION OF BRIEF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON CEREBRAL CORTEX OF RAT .1. DURING CURRENT FLOW + .2. IN PRODUCTION OF LONG-LECTING AFTER-EFFECTS [J].
BINDMAN, LJ ;
LIPPOLD, OCJ ;
REDFEARN, JW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1964, 172 (03) :369-&
[3]   MODULATION BY APPLIED ELECTRIC-FIELDS OF PURKINJE AND STELLATE CELL-ACTIVITY IN THE ISOLATED TURTLE CEREBELLUM [J].
CHAN, CY ;
NICHOLSON, C .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1986, 371 :89-114
[4]   EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC-FIELDS ON TRANSMEMBRANE POTENTIAL AND EXCITABILITY OF TURTLE CEREBELLAR PURKINJE-CELLS INVITRO [J].
CHAN, CY ;
HOUNSGAARD, J ;
NICHOLSON, C .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1988, 402 :751-771
[5]   Cortical thickness in primary sensorimotor cortex influences the effectiveness of paired associative stimulation [J].
Conde, Virginia ;
Vollmann, Henning ;
Sehm, Bernhard ;
Taubert, Marco ;
Villringer, Arno ;
Ragert, Patrick .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 60 (02) :864-870
[6]   ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - SURFACE EMG AND SINGLE MOTOR UNIT RESPONSES [J].
DAY, BL ;
DRESSLER, D ;
DENOORDHOUT, AM ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
NAKASHIMA, K ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
THOMPSON, PD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 412 :449-473
[7]   Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: Direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans [J].
Di Lazzaro, V. ;
Pilato, F. ;
Oliviero, A. ;
Dileone, M. ;
Saturno, E. ;
Mazzone, P. ;
Insola, A. ;
Profice, P. ;
Ranieri, F. ;
Capone, F. ;
Tonali, P. A. ;
Rothwell, J. C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 96 (04) :1765-1771
[8]   Modulation of motor cortex neuronal networks by rTMS: comparison of local and remote effects of six different protocols of stimulation [J].
Di Lazzaro, V. ;
Dileone, M. ;
Pilato, F. ;
Capone, F. ;
Musumeci, G. ;
Ranieri, F. ;
Ricci, V. ;
Bria, P. ;
Di Iorio, R. ;
de Waure, C. ;
Pasqualetti, P. ;
Profice, P. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (05) :2150-2156
[9]   Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on the Excitability of Corticospinal Axons of the Human Cerebral Cortex [J].
Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo ;
Ranieri, Federico ;
Profice, Paolo ;
Pilato, Fabio ;
Mazzone, Paolo ;
Capone, Fioravante ;
Insola, Angelo ;
Oliviero, Antonio .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) :641-643
[10]   Modulation of corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation: Reproducibility of effects and intraindividual reliability [J].
Fratello, Fabiana ;
Veniero, Domenica ;
Curcio, Giuseppe ;
Ferrara, Michele ;
Marzano, Cristina ;
Moroni, Fabio ;
Pellicciari, Maria Concetta ;
Bertini, Mario ;
Rossini, Paolo Maria ;
De Gennaro, Luigi .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (12) :2667-2674