Measurement of structural progression in osteoarthritis of the hip: the Barcelona consensus group

被引:110
作者
Altman, RD
Bloch, DA
Dougados, M
Hochberg, M
Lohmander, S
Pavelka, K
Vignon, E
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Rheumatol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ Paris 05, Cochin Hosp, Rheumatol Dept B, Paris, France
[4] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[5] Lund Univ, Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Lund, Sweden
[6] Charles Univ Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
[7] St Thomas Hosp, London, England
[8] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Rhumatol, Lyon, France
关键词
osteoarthritis; radiography; X-ray; hip; structure modification; disease modification; joint space width;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2004.04.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To outline the best available method of measurement for detecting progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip especially in therapeutic trials. Method A Medline search of articles related to progression of hip CA was performed. A group of experts met over a 1.5-day session to review available literature and new research. Specific questions were addressed in order to reach a consensus on measuring progression of CA of the hip. Results: Of the available surrogate measures, a single yearly standing or reclined antero-posterior plain radiograph of the pelvis with feet internally rotated 15-20degrees, can be evaluated with the use of an atlas for joint space width (JSW, interbone distance). There should be a minimum JSW upon baseline screening that may be 1 or 2 mm. Digitization of films offers a slight reduction in variability of measurements. Progression of OA can be calculated by measurement of the JSW on paired and blinded films. A reduction of greater than or equal to0.5 mm is greater than the 'minimum perceptible difference' as well as the variation of most imaging techniques, and represents a clinically relevant and significant reduction in the JSW. Narrowing of the superomedial or superolateral JSW may tend to progress more rapidly than other changes. In clinical trials, patients who discontinue the study treatment need to be followed after discontinuation, and an imputation strategy which provides unbiased estimates of both the treatment effect and its variance is an appropriate technique for intent-to-treat analysis. Conclusion: For the development of new agents intended to prevent, retard, stabilize or reverse the progress of CA of the hip, the radiographic methodology presently available is adequate to detect changes in hip JSW of OA. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of OsteoArthritis Research Society International.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 524
页数:10
相关论文
共 84 条
[21]   DEFINING OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES [J].
CROFT, P ;
COOPER, C ;
WICKHAM, C ;
COGGON, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (03) :514-522
[22]   Arthroscopy of the hip: 12 years of experience [J].
Dorfmann, H ;
Boyer, T .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1999, 15 (01) :67-72
[23]  
Dougados M, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V44, P2539, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2539::AID-ART434>3.0.CO
[24]  
2-T
[25]  
Dougados M, 1997, REV RHUM, V64, P795
[26]   Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: Definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status [J].
Dougados, M ;
Gueguen, A ;
Nguyen, M ;
Berdah, L ;
Lequesne, M ;
Mazieres, B ;
Vignon, E .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1996, 55 (06) :356-362
[27]  
DOUGADOS M, 1995, REV RHUM, V62, P169
[28]  
GERBER AC, 1999, AM J MED, V107, P542
[29]   The radiographic joint space width in clinically normal hips: effects of age, gender and physical parameters [J].
Goker, B ;
Sancak, A ;
Arac, M ;
Shott, S ;
Block, JA .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2003, 11 (05) :328-334
[30]  
Goker B, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V43, P988, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<988::AID-ANR5>3.0.CO