Combined colposcopy, loop conization, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia

被引:35
作者
Bar-Am, A
Daniel, Y
Ron, IG
Niv, J
Kupferminc, MJ
Bornstein, J
Lessing, JB
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Lis Matern Hosp, Cerv Pathol Unit, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Lis Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.2000.5825
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. Loop electrosurgical excision of the transformation zone (LEETZ) was recently associated with relatively high failure rates. We evaluated whether the combination of LEETZ with laser vaporization is superior to LEETZ alone in reducing the rates of recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease. Methods. The study population included 426 women with histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3, of whom 289 (study group) were treated by LEETZ followed by laser vaporization of the crater base and walls and 137 (control group) were treated by LEETZ alone. All women were followed scrupulously at regular intervals for recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease. The mean follow-up periods were 43 and 59 months for the study and control groups, respectively. Results. Both groups were derived from the same community and were similar in epidemiologic characteristics and disease severity. Although the incidence of positive surgical margins was similar in both groups (10.4 and 9.5% for the study and control groups, respectively), recurrent abnormal cytology (10.2% vs 5.5%, P = 0.07) and histologic residual disease (21.4% vs 0%, P = 0.05) were more frequent among women in the control group. This applied to women with both negative and positive surgical margins. Both study and control women with positive surgical margins, especially at the endocervix, were at higher risk for recurrence. Conclusion. The addition of laser vaporization to LEETZ may improve outcome of both women with positive margins and women with negative margins. Our results support conservative management for all treated women, regardless of cone margin status. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 51
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AHLGREN M, 1975, OBSTET GYNECOL, V46, P135
[2]   Is needle diathermy excision of the transformation zone a better treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than large loop excision? [J].
Basu, PS ;
D'Arcy, T ;
McIndoe, A ;
Soutter, WP .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9167) :1852-1853
[3]   INVASIVE-CARCINOMA AFTER CONE BIOPSY FOR CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA [J].
BROWN, JV ;
PETERS, WA ;
CORWIN, DJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 40 (01) :25-28
[4]  
FELIX JC, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P996
[5]   Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III [J].
Gardeil, F ;
BarryWalsh, C ;
Prendiville, W ;
Clinch, J ;
Turner, MJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (03) :419-422
[6]   Loop electrocautery excisional procedure: Therapeutic effectiveness as an ablation and a conization equivalent [J].
Gold, M ;
Dunton, CJ ;
Murray, J ;
Macones, G ;
Hanau, C ;
Carlson, JA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 61 (02) :241-244
[7]  
JANSEN FW, 1994, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V37, P270
[8]   DIATHERMY LOOP EXCISION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA - DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT IN ONE PROCEDURE [J].
KEIJSER, KGG ;
KENEMANS, P ;
VANDERZANDEN, PHTH ;
SCHIJF, CPT ;
VOOIJS, GP ;
ROLLAND, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (04) :1281-1287
[9]  
LAPAQUETTE TK, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P440
[10]   LOOP DIATHERMY EXCISION OF THE CERVICAL TRANSFORMATION ZONE IN PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL CERVICAL SMEARS [J].
LUESLEY, DM ;
CULLIMORE, J ;
REDMAN, CWE ;
LAWTON, FG ;
EMENS, JM ;
ROLLASON, TP ;
WILLIAMS, DR ;
BUXTON, EJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6741) :1690-1693