Comparison of Spatial Summation Properties of Neurons in Macaque V1 and V2

被引:104
作者
Shushruth, S. [1 ]
Ichida, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Levitt, Jonathan B. [2 ]
Angelucci, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Moran Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Dept Biol, New York, NY 10031 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
PRIMARY VISUAL-CORTEX; CLASSICAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD; AREA V2; FUNCTIONAL-ORGANIZATION; CORTICAL CONNECTIONS; CORTICOCORTICAL CONNECTIONS; ORIENTATION SELECTIVITY; AFFERENT CONNECTIVITY; MODULAR ORGANIZATION; FEEDBACK CONNECTIONS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00512.2009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Shushruth S, Ichida JM, Levitt JB, Angelucci A. Comparison of spatial summation properties of neurons in macaque V1 and V2. J Neurophysiol 102: 2069-2083, 2009. First published August 5, 2009; doi: 10.1152/jn.00512.2009. In visual cortex, responses to stimulation of the receptive field (RF) are modulated by simultaneous stimulation of the RF surround. The mechanisms for surround modulation remain unidentified. We previously proposed that in the primary visual cortex (V1), near surround modulation is mediated by geniculocortical and horizontal connections and far surround modulation by interareal feedback connections. To understand spatial integration in the secondary visual cortex (V2) and its underlying circuitry, we have characterized spatial summation in different V2 layers and stripe compartments and compared it to that in V1. We used grating stimuli in circular and annular apertures of different sizes to estimate the extent and sensitivity of RF and surround components in V1 and V2. V2 RFs and surrounds were twice as large as those in V1. As in V1, V2 RFs doubled in size when measured at low contrast. In both V1 and V2, surrounds were about fivefold the size of the RF and the far surround could exceed 12.5 degrees in radius, averaging 5.5 degrees in V1 and 9.2 degrees in V2. The strength of surround suppression was similar in both areas. Thus although differing in spatial scale, the interactions among RF components are similar in V1 and V2, suggesting similar underlying mechanisms. As in V1, the extent of V2 horizontal connections matches that of the RF center, but is much smaller than the largest far surrounds, which likely derive from interareal feedback. In V2, we found no laminar or stripe differences in size and magnitude of surround suppression, suggesting conservation across stripes of the basic circuit for surround modulation.
引用
收藏
页码:2069 / 2083
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Origin and dynamics of extraclassical suppression in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque monkey [J].
Alitto, Henry J. ;
Usrey, W. Martin .
NEURON, 2008, 57 (01) :135-146
[2]   STIMULUS SPECIFIC RESPONSES FROM BEYOND THE CLASSICAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD - NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS FOR LOCAL GLOBAL COMPARISONS IN VISUAL NEURONS [J].
ALLMAN, J ;
MIEZIN, F ;
MCGUINNESS, E .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1985, 8 :407-430
[3]  
Angelucci A., 1998, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V24, P897
[4]  
Angelucci A, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P8633
[5]   Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 [J].
Angelucci, Alessandra ;
Bressloff, Paul C. .
VISUAL PERCEPTION, PART 1, FUNDAMENTALS OF VISION: LOW AND MID-LEVEL PROCESSES IN PERCEPTION, 2006, 154 :93-120
[6]   Contribution of feedforward thalamic afferents and corticogeniculate feedback to the spatial summation area of macaque V1 and LGN [J].
Angelucci, Alessandra ;
Sainsbury, Kesi .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2006, 498 (03) :330-351
[7]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOMETRIKA
[8]  
Bair W, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P7690
[9]   NEURAL MECHANISM OF BINOCULAR DEPTH DISCRIMINATION [J].
BARLOW, HB ;
BLAKEMOR.C ;
PETTIGRE.JD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1967, 193 (02) :327-&
[10]  
BLAKEMORE C, 1972, EXP BRAIN RES, V15, P439