Ecosystem services in practice: Challenges to real world implementation of ecosystem services across multiple landscapes - A critical review

被引:55
作者
Portman, Michelle E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Ecosystem services; Geographic information systems; Biodiversity conservation; Policy integration; Marine services; Ecosystem service assessments; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; LAND-USE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem services assessment (ESA) have become common parlance in the environmental field. Scientists, policy-makers and activists have promoted the ES approach as a means of conveying the extent of threats to natural ecosystems with the goal of crafting socially acceptable and effective policy to address ecological threats and biodiversity conservation. Yet there are some significant challenges to wide acceptance of the ES approach which hinder its absorption into the mainstream geography literature. This paper reviews the historical development of the ES approach focusing on its relevance to applied geography at different stages of its development, describes the present state-of-the-art of ES, and synthesizes the results from several seminal papers and reports. I posit that there are two major stumbling blocks: 1) the difficulty of simplifying complexities between services so that statutory planning processes can incorporate the approach, and 2) the lack of cross-landscape assessment methods and examples. If we focus on the most immediately surmountable challenges to the ES approach much progress could be made in a short time. The subsequent and final substantive section of this review summaries these challenges and offers some suggestions for moving forward. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 192
页数:8
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Agardy T, 2000, B MAR SCI, V66, P875
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENV LAW
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, ENV LAND USE PLANNIN
  • [5] [Anonymous], UK NAT EC ASS SYNTH
  • [6] [Anonymous], DUKE ENV L POLY F
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2006, MARINE COASTAL ECOSY
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, SATOYAMA SATOUMI ECO