The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking

被引:350
作者
Ryan, C. G. [1 ]
Grant, P. M. [1 ]
Tigbe, W. W. [1 ]
Granat, M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjsm.2006.027276
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: The accurate measurement of physical activity is crucial to understanding the relationship between physical activity and disease prevention and treatment. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the activPAL physical activity monitor in measuring step number and cadence. Methods: The ability of the activPAL monitor to measure step number and cadence in 20 healthy adults (age 34.5+/-6.9 years; BMI 26.8+/-4.8 (mean+/-SD)) was evaluated against video observation. Concurrently, the accuracy of two commonly used pedometers, the Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 and the Omron HJ-109-E, was compared to observation for measuring step number. Participants walked on a treadmill at five different speeds (0.90, 1.12, 1.33, 1.56, and 1.78 m/s) and outdoors at three self selected speeds (slow, normal, and fast). Results: At all speeds, inter device reliability was excellent for the activPAL (ICC (2,1)>= 0.99) for both step number and cadence. The absolute percentage error for the activPAL was <1.11% for step number and cadence regardless of walking speed. The accuracy of the pedometers was adversely affected by slow walking speeds. Conclusion: The activPAL monitor is a valid and reliable measure of walking in healthy adults. Its accuracy is not influenced by walking speed. The activPAL may be a useful device in sports medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 784
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
American College Sports Medicine, 2006, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P
[2]   Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked [J].
Bassett, DR ;
Ainsworth, BE ;
Leggett, SR ;
Mathien, CA ;
Main, JA ;
Hunter, DC ;
Duncan, GE .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (08) :1071-1077
[3]   The accuracy of pedometer steps and time during walking in children [J].
Beets, MW ;
Patton, MM ;
Edwards, S .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (03) :513-520
[4]  
Blair SN, 2004, AM J CLIN NUTR, V79, P913
[5]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[6]  
Chakravarthy MV, 2002, MAYO CLIN PROC, V77, P165
[7]  
Coleman KL, 1999, J REHABIL RES DEV, V36, P8
[8]   Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community-dwelling older adults [J].
Cyarto, EV ;
Myers, AM ;
Tudor-Locke, C .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (02) :205-209
[9]   Precision and accuracy of an ankle-wom accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure [J].
Foster, RC ;
Lanningham-Foster, LM ;
Manohar, C ;
McCrady, SK ;
Nysse, LJ ;
Kaufman, KR ;
Padgett, DJ ;
Levine, JA .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 41 (3-4) :778-783
[10]   Physical activity and health: current issues and research needs [J].
Hardman, AE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (05) :1193-1197