Differences between near-surface equivalent temperature and temperature trends for the Eastern United States - Equivalent temperature as an alternative measure of heat content

被引:29
作者
Davey, Christopher A. [1 ]
Pielke, Roger A., Sr.
Gallo, Kevin P.
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] NOAA, NESDIS, Camp Springs, MD USA
[3] USGS Earth Resources Observ Syst Data Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
climate change; heating trends; near-surface air temperature; moist enthalpy; equivalent temperature; microclimate;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.11.002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
There is currently much attention being given to the observed increase in near-surface air temperatures during the last century. The proper investigation of heating trends, however, requires that we include surface heat content to monitor this aspect of the climate system. Changes in heat content of the Earth's climate are not fully described by temperature alone. Moist enthalpy or, alternatively, equivalent temperature, is more sensitive to surface vegetation properties than is air temperature and therefore more accurately depicts surface heating trends. The microclimates evident at many surface observation sites highlight the influence of land surface characteristics on local surface heating trends. Temperature and equivalent temperature trend differences from 1982-1997 are examined for surface sites in the Eastern U.S. Overall trend differences at the surface indicate equivalent temperature trends are relatively warmer than temperature trends in the Eastern U.S. Seasonally, equivalent temperature trends are relatively warmer than temperature trends in winter and are relatively cooler in the fall. These patterns, however, vary widely from site to site, so local microclimate is very important. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Why is the global warming proceeding much slower than expected? [J].
Bengtsson, L ;
Roeckner, E ;
Stendel, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D4) :3865-3876
[2]  
BIRDSEY RA, 1995, USDA ROCKY, V271, P56
[3]   Climate - Impact of land-use change on climate - Reply [J].
Cai, M ;
Kalnay, E .
NATURE, 2004, 427 (6971) :214-214
[4]   Microclimate exposures of surface-based weather stations - Implications for the assessment of long-term femperature trends [J].
Davey, CA ;
Pielke, RA .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (04) :497-+
[5]  
DAVEY CA, 2005, THESIS COLORADO STAT
[6]  
Devore JL., 2000, Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences
[7]   NONLINEAR-REGRESSION WITH AUTOCORRELATED ERRORS [J].
GALLANT, AR ;
GOEBEL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (356) :961-967
[8]  
Gallo KP, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P2941, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<2941:TIOLUC>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Evaluation of temperature differences for paired stations of the US climate reference network [J].
Gallo, KP .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2005, 18 (10) :1629-1636