Description of nine nutrient loss models: capabilities and suitability based on their characteristics

被引：52

作者：

Schoumans, O. F. ^{[1
]}

Silgram, M. ^{[2
]}

Groenendijk, P. ^{[1
]}

Bouraoui, F. ^{[3
]}

Andersen, H. E. ^{[4
]}

Kronvang, B. ^{[4
]}

Behrendt, H. ^{[5
]}

Arheimer, B. ^{[6
]}

Johnsson, H. ^{[6
]}

Panagopoulos, Y. ^{[7
]}

Mimikou, M. ^{[7
]}

Lo Porto, A. ^{[8
]}

Reisser, H. ^{[9
]}

Le Gall, G. ^{[9
]}

Barr, A. ^{[10
]}

Anthony, S. G. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands

[2] ADAS Ltd, Wolverhampton WV6 8TQ, W Midlands, England

[3] JRC, EC, Ispra, Italy

[4] Natl Environm Res Inst, Silkeborg, Denmark

[5] Inst Gewaesseroekol & Binnenfischerei, Berlin, Germany

[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden

[7] NTUA, Athens, Greece

[8] Inst Ric Acque, Bari, Italy

[9] Beture Cerec St Quentin Yvelines, Lyon, France

[10] KMM, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2009年 / 11卷 / 03期

关键词：

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; NITROGEN;

D O I：

10.1039/b823239c

中图分类号：

O65 [分析化学];

学科分类号：

070302 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

In EUROHARP, an EC Framework V project, which started in 2002 with 21 partners in 17 countries across Europe, a detailed intercomparison of contemporary catchment-scale modelling approaches was undertaken to characterise the relative importance of point and diffuse pollution of nutrients in surface freshwater systems. The study focused on the scientific evaluation of different modelling approaches, which were validated on three core catchments (the Ouse, UK; the Vansjo-Hobol, Norway; and the Enza, Italy), and the application of each tool to three additional, randomly chosen catchments across Europe. The tools involved differ profoundly in their complexity, level of process representation and data requirements. The tools include simple loading models, statistical, conceptual and empirical model approaches, and physics-based (mechanistic) models. The results of a scientific intercomparison of the characteristics of these different model approaches are described. This includes an analysis of potential strengths and weaknesses of the nutrient models.

引用

页码：506 / 514

页数：9

共 35 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 32 DJF

[2]

Anthony S., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, P23

[3]

ANTHONY SG, INT J RIVER IN PRESS

[4]

ANTHONY SG, 2009, J ENVIRON MONITOR, DOI DOI 10.1039/B901181A

[5]

Arheimer B, 1998, AMBIO, V27, P471

[6] Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].

Arnold, JG ;

Srinivasan, R ;

Muttiah, RS ;

Williams, JR .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89

[7]

BEHRENDT H, 2003, 8203 UBATEXTE

[8]

Behrendt H., 2005, Nutrients and heavy metals in the Odra River system

[9]

Bergstrom S., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P443

[10]

BORGVANG SA, 2000, 17592000 SFT

← 1 2 3 4 →