Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness

被引:56
作者
Murdock, J [1 ]
Roelke, D [1 ]
Gelwick, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Wildlife & Fisheries Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
stream restoration; periphyton; wastewater effluent; urban watershed; scouring; flood frequency;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.05.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Urban stream restoration is a very complex task due largely to the interactions between the physical, chemical, and biological stream components. Because of these interactions, restoring only a single component to a more natural state could have a negative affect on stream health. We studied pre-restoration interactions between hydrology, nutrients, and periphyton in a stream where wastewater effluent and a highly developed urban watershed dominated stream flow. Floods capable of scouring all visible periphyton from the stream were produced from rainfall events as small as 1.3 cm and created 47 periphyton biomass reset events during our 22-month study period. Despite these disturbances, periphyton biomass rapidly accumulated throughout the stream and reached nuisance levels after 5 days of growth during every season. Floods did, however, severely limit the occurrence of steady-state assemblages, which attained biomass levels 30 times the nuisance level. Although the high frequency of floods did not prevent nuisance levels of periphyton, it did allow more edible early stage periphyton assemblages to become far more common than late-stag, less edible assemblages. In the case of the stream studied, a successful restoration strategy must consider coupled processes relating to hydrology, chemistry, and biota. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PERIPHYTON FRESHWATE
[2]  
*AWWA, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]  
Biggs Barry J. F., 1996, P31, DOI 10.1016/B978-012668450-6/50031-X
[4]   PERIPHYTON BIOMASS DYNAMICS IN GRAVEL BED RIVERS - THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF FLOWS AND NUTRIENTS [J].
BIGGS, BJF ;
CLOSE, ME .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1989, 22 (02) :209-231
[5]   GRAZING ON EPIPHYTES [J].
CATTANEO, A .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1983, 28 (01) :124-132
[6]   Nonpoint source runoff modeling - A comparison of a forested watershed and an urban watershed on the South Carolina coast [J].
Corbett, CW ;
Wahl, M ;
Porter, DE ;
Edwards, D ;
Moise, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 1997, 213 (01) :133-149
[7]  
Cox E.J, 1996, Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material, V1
[8]   Comparison of usefulness of three types of artificial substrata (glass, wood and plastic) when studying settlement patterns of periphyton in lakes of different trophic status [J].
Danilov, RA ;
Ekelund, NGA .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 45 (03) :167-170
[9]   SEASONAL SUCCESSION OF ALGAL PERIPHYTON FROM A WASTE-WATER TREATMENT FACILITY [J].
DAVIS, LS ;
HOFFMANN, JP ;
COOK, PW .
JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1990, 26 (04) :611-617
[10]   Effects of experimentally induced cyanobacterial blooms on crustacean zooplankton communities [J].
Ghadouani, A ;
Pinel-Alloul, B ;
Prepas, EE .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (02) :363-381