Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma

被引:177
作者
Kondo, S [1 ]
Nimura, Y [1 ]
Hayakawa, N [1 ]
Kamiya, J [1 ]
Nagino, M [1 ]
Uesaka, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 1, Showa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4668550, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01384.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There have been no reports on the routine use of regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer. The aim of this study was to elucidate nodal status, its prognostic influence and the efficacy of lymphadenectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 60 patients who underwent radical resection and routine regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Results: Of the 60 patients, 73 per cent had node-positive disease and 38 per cent had positive para-aortic nodes. Postoperative survival was extremely poor in patients with minimal distant metastasis, and similarly in patients with para-aortic disease. The survival of patients with metastasis limited to the regional nodes was significantly better than that of those with distant metastasis (P = 0.029) or para-aortic disease (P = 0.017) and was not significantly different from that of patients with no metastasis (P = 0.82). Conclusion: Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy provides no survival benefit for patients with para-aortic disease, which has an influence on poor prognosis equivalent to that of distant metastasis. It has the potential to bring survival benefit only in selected patients with metastasis limited to the regional nodes. A sampling biopsy of the para-aortic nodes before starting radical surgery is recommended because they are involved more frequently than expected.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer - Implications for staging and management [J].
Bartlett, DL ;
Fong, YM ;
Fortner, JG ;
Brennan, MF ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (05) :639-646
[2]   Long-term results after curative resection for carcinoma of the gallbladder [J].
Benoist, S ;
Panis, Y ;
Fagniez, PL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (02) :118-122
[3]   Clinicopathologic differences between long-term and short-term postoperative survivors with advanced gallbladder carcinoma [J].
Chijiiwa, K ;
Yamaguchi, K ;
Tanaka, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (01) :98-102
[4]   CARCINOMA OF GALLBLADDER - A STUDY OF ITS MODES OF SPREAD [J].
FAHIM, RB ;
RICHARDS, JC ;
FERRIS, DO ;
MCDONALD, JR .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1962, 156 (01) :114-&
[5]  
HENSON DE, 1992, CANCER, V70, P1493, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920915)70:6<1493::AID-CNCR2820700608>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-U
[7]  
Ito M, 1994, J HEPATOL BIL PANCRE, V1, P302
[8]  
MORROW CE, 1983, SURGERY, V94, P709
[9]   CHANGES IN HEPATIC LOBE VOLUME IN BILIARY-TRACT CANCER-PATIENTS AFTER RIGHT PORTAL-VEIN EMBOLIZATION [J].
NAGINO, M ;
NIMURA, Y ;
KAMIYA, J ;
HAYAKAWA, N ;
KONDO, S ;
UESAKA, K ;
KIN, Y ;
YAMAMOTO, H .
HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 21 (02) :434-439
[10]  
NAKAMURA S, 1995, SURGERY, V117, P232