AN AUSTRALIAN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO VALUE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES

被引:118
作者
Viney, Rosalie [1 ]
Norman, Richard [1 ]
Brazier, John [2 ]
Cronin, Paula [1 ]
King, Madeleine T. [3 ]
Ratcliffe, Julie [4 ]
Street, Deborah [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, CHERE, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Univ Sheffield, ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Psychooncol Cooperat Res Grp PoCoG, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Ctr Clin Change & Hlth Care Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Dept Math Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
EQ-5D; Australia; Discrete Choice Experiment; cost-utility analysis; TIME TRADE-OFF; CONSUMPTION; PREFERENCES; VALUATIONS; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/hec.2953
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
Conventionally, generic quality-of-life health states, defined within multi-attribute utility instruments, have been valued using a Standard Gamble or a Time Trade-Off. Both are grounded in expected utility theory but impose strong assumptions about the form of the utility function. Preference elicitation tasks for both are complicated, limiting the number of health states that each respondent can value and, therefore, that can be valued overall. The usual approach has been to value a set of the possible health states and impute values for the remainder. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) offer an attractive alternative, allowing investigation of more flexible specifications of the utility function and greater coverage of the response surface. We designed a DCE to obtain values for EQ-5D health states and implemented it in an Australia-representative online panel (n = 1,031). A range of specifications investigating non-linear preferences with respect to time and interactions between EQ-5D levels were estimated using a random-effects probit model. The results provide empirical support for a flexible utility function, including at least some two-factor interactions. We then constructed a preference index such that full health and death were valued at 1 and 0, respectively, to provide a DCE-based algorithm for Australian cost-utility analyses. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 742
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]
[Anonymous], 1999, 172 U YORK YORK HLTH
[3]
Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values [J].
Bansback, Nick ;
Brazier, John ;
Tsuchiya, Aki ;
Anis, Aslam .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 31 (01) :306-318
[4]
Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: when is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Quiggin, J .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (06) :681-708
[5]
A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities [J].
Bleichrodt, H .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (05) :447-456
[6]
The validity of QALYs: An experimental test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Johannesson, M .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) :21-32
[7]
Bleichrodt N, 1997, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V15, P107
[8]
Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality [J].
Bowling, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 27 (03) :281-291
[9]
Brazier J., 2007, MEASURING VALUING HL
[10]
Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: A randomised trial [J].
Coast J. ;
Flynn T.N. ;
Salisbury C. ;
Louviere J. ;
Peters T.J. .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2006, 5 (4) :249-260