Temozolomide: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Malignant Digestive Endocrine Tumors

被引:27
作者
Maire, Frederique [1 ]
Hammel, Pascal [1 ]
Faivre, Sandrine [2 ]
Hentic, Olivia [1 ]
Yapur, Lorena [2 ]
Larroque, Beatrice [3 ]
Couvelard, Anne [4 ]
Zappa, Magaly [5 ]
Raymond, Eric [2 ]
Levy, Philippe [1 ]
Ruszniewski, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Beaujon, Serv Gastroenterol Pancreatol, FR-92118 Clichy, France
[2] Hop Beaujon, Serv Oncol, FR-92118 Clichy, France
[3] Hop Beaujon, Serv Epidemiol & Stat, FR-92118 Clichy, France
[4] Hop Beaujon, Serv Anat Pathol, FR-92118 Clichy, France
[5] Hop Beaujon, Serv Radiol, FR-92118 Clichy, France
关键词
Digestive endocrine tumor; Temozolomide; ISLET-CELL-CARCINOMA; PHASE-II TRIAL; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS; ONCOLOGY-GROUP; DACARBAZINE; DOXORUBICIN; FLUOROURACIL; STREPTOZOCIN;
D O I
10.1159/000225389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Systemic chemotherapies are associated with limited response rates and significant toxicity in patients with malignant digestive endocrine tumors (DET). Preliminary studies have reported interesting results with temozolomide in patients with DET. Aim: It was the aim of this study to assess the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in patients with malignant DET. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients, median age 61 years (range 56-77), with metastatic well-differentiated DET were retrospectively studied. All patients except 1 had received prior treatment (hepatic resection, chemotherapy). All patients had progressive disease in the 3 months prior to entry into the study. Temozolomide was administered at doses of 200 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, every 28 days. Treatment was assessed for safety, progression-free and overall survival. Results: The median number of temozolomide cycles was 5 (range 2-15). Grade 3 hematological toxicity occurred in 5 patients. There were no toxic deaths. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, partial response and stabilization were obtained in 1 (5%) and 17 patients (81%), respectively. The median time to progression was 9 months (range 3-26). The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 42 and 77%, respectively. Conclusion: Temozolomide is a well-tolerated oral chemotherapy in patients with malignant DET, including those who have already received treatment. In patients with progressive disease, temozolomide controls tumor progression in 86% of cases. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 72
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
ALTIMARI AF, 1987, SURGERY, V102, P1009
[2]
BUKOWSKI RM, 1994, CANCER, V73, P1505, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940301)73:5<1505::AID-CNCR2820730530>3.0.CO
[3]
2-V
[4]
The doxorubicin-streptozotocin combination for the treatment of advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinoma: a judicious option? [J].
Delaunoit, T ;
Ducreux, M ;
Boige, V ;
Dromain, C ;
Sabourin, JC ;
Duvillard, P ;
Schlumberger, M ;
de Baere, T ;
Rougier, P ;
Ruffie, P ;
Elias, D ;
Lasser, P ;
Baudin, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (04) :515-520
[5]
Temozolomide as monotherapy is effective in treatment of advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors [J].
Ekeblad, Sara ;
Sundin, Anders ;
Janson, Eva Tiensuu ;
Welin, Staffan ;
Granberg, Dan ;
Kindmark, Henrik ;
Dunder, Kristina ;
Kozlovacki, Gordana ;
Orlefors, Hakan ;
Sigurd, Mattias ;
Oberg, Kjell ;
Eriksson, Barbro ;
Skogseid, Britt .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (10) :2986-2991
[6]
Isacoff WH., 2006, Journal of Clinical Oncology, V24, P14023, DOI [10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.14023, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.24.18_SUPPL.14023]
[7]
Kulke MH, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p189S
[8]
Kulke MH, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25
[9]
Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors [J].
Kulke, MH ;
Stuart, K ;
Enzinger, PC ;
Ryan, DP ;
Clark, JW ;
Muzikansky, A ;
Vincitore, M ;
Michelini, A ;
Fuchs, CS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (03) :401-406
[10]
Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: Pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures [J].
Lu, DSK ;
Vedantham, S ;
Krasny, RM ;
Kadell, B ;
Berger, WL ;
Reber, HA .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) :697-701