Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association With Adenoma Detection A Prospective Colonoscopy Study

被引:51
作者
Wong, Martin C. S. [1 ,2 ]
Ching, Jessica Y. L. [1 ]
Chan, Victor C. W. [1 ]
Lam, Thomas Y. T. [1 ]
Luk, Arthur K. C. [1 ]
Tang, Raymond S. Y. [1 ]
Wong, Sunny H. [1 ]
Ng, Siew C. [1 ]
Ng, Simon S. M. [1 ]
Wu, Justin C. Y. [1 ]
Chan, Francis K. L. [1 ]
Sung, Joseph J. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Inst Digest Dis, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
CANCER SCREENING-TESTS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; VALIDATED TOOL; RISK; NEOPLASIA; CHOICE; IMPACT; VOLUME; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000002251
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
The predictors of poor bowel preparation in colorectal cancer screening participants have not been adequately studied, and the association between the quality of bowel preparation and adenoma detection has not been firmly established. This study examined the determinants of poor bowel preparation, and evaluated its relationship with adenoma detection. We included subjects aged between 50 and 70 years who received colonoscopy between 2008 and 2014 in a colorectal cancer screening program in Hong Kong. The quality of the bowel preparation was assessed by colonoscopists, and the factors associated with poor bowel cleansing were evaluated by a binary logistic regression analysis. A multivariate regression model was constructed to evaluate if poor bowel preparation was associated with detection of colorectal neoplasia. From 5470 screening participants (average age 57.7 years, SD 4.9), 1891 (34.6%) had poor or fair bowel preparation. The average cecal intubation time was 7.0 minutes (SD 5.4; range 1.22-36.9 minutes) and the average colonoscopy withdrawal time was 10.8 minutes (SD 6.9; range 6.0-107.0 minutes). Among all, 26.5% had colorectal neoplasia and 5.5% had advanced neoplasia. Older age (>= 60 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.19-1.38, P = 0.02-0.04), male sex (AOR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.60, P < 0.001), and current smoking (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.75, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with poor/fair bowel preparation. Poorer cleansing resulted in significantly lower detection rate of neoplasia (AOR = 0.35-0.62) and advanced neoplasia (AOR = 0.36-0.50) irrespective of polyp size. Steps to improve proper procedures of bowel preparation are warranted, especially among subjects at risk of poor bowel preparation. Strategies should be implemented to improve bowel cleansing, which is now demonstrated as a definite quality indicator.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Effect of a Time-Dependent Colonoscopic Withdrawal Protocol on Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (10) :1091-1098
[2]
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Doughty, Andrea S. ;
Johanson, John F. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) :2533-2541
[3]
Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy A Population-Based, Case-Control Study [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Rickert, Alexander ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (01) :22-U156
[4]
Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2541, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
[5]
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[6]
GLOBOCAN, 2012, CANC FACT SHEET COL
[7]
Colonoscopy Practice Patterns Since Introduction of Medicare Coverage for Average-Risk Screening [J].
Harewood, Gavin C. ;
Lieberman, David A. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 2 (01) :72-77
[8]
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Sharma, VK ;
de Garmo, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :76-79
[9]
Consensus document - Preamble [J].
Hawes, RH ;
Lowry, A ;
Deziel, D .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (07) :894-894
[10]
Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies [J].
Jover, Rodrigo ;
Zapater, Pedro ;
Polana, Eduardo ;
Bujanda, Luis ;
Lanas, Angel ;
Hermo, Jose A. ;
Cubiella, Joaquin ;
Ono, Akiko ;
Gonzalez-Mendez, Yanira ;
Peris, Antonio ;
Pellise, Maria ;
Seoane, Agustin ;
Herreros-de-Tejada, Alberto ;
Ponce, Marta ;
Marin-Gabriel, Jose C. ;
Chaparro, Maria ;
Cacho, Guillermo ;
Fernandez-Diez, Servando ;
Arenas, Juan ;
Sopena, Federico ;
de-Castro, Luisa ;
Vega-Villaamil, Pablo ;
Rodriguez-Soler, Maria ;
Carballo, Fernando ;
Salas, Dolores ;
Morillas, Juan D. ;
Andreu, Montserrat ;
Quintero, Enrique ;
Castells, Antoni .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 77 (03) :381-+