The transfer of a LC-UV method for the determination of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid in Lidoses: Use of total error as decision criterion

被引:22
作者
Rozet, E.
Mertens, B.
Dewe, W.
Ceccato, A.
Govaerts, B.
Boulanger, B.
Chiap, P.
Streel, B.
Crommen, J.
Hubert, Ph.
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Inst Pharm, Analyt Chem Lab, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Liege, Inst Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Analyt Chem, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[3] Univ Catholique Louvain, Inst Stat, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Lily Dev Ctr, Dept Stat, B-1348 Mt Sr Guibert, Belgium
关键词
analytical method transfer; transfer methodology; tolerance interval; risk; statistical approaches;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2005.12.037
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two new statistical approaches to assess the validity of the transfer of a LC-UV method for the determination of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid were investigated and compared to the conventional approaches generally used in this domain. These new approaches, namely the Tolerance Interval and the Risk approaches, are based on the simultaneous evaluation of the systematic (or trueness) and random (or precision) errors of the transfer into a single criterion called total error (or accuracy). The results of the transfer showed that only the total error based approaches fulfilled the objective of an analytical method transfer, i.e. to give guarantees that each future measurement made by the receiving laboratory will be close enough to the true value of the analyte in the sample. Furthermore the Risk approach was the most powerful one and allowed the estimation of the risk to have future measurements out of specification in the receiving laboratory, therefore being a risk management tool. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progresses and limitations [J].
Boulanger, B ;
Chiap, P ;
Dewe, W ;
Crommen, J ;
Hubert, P .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 32 (4-5) :753-765
[2]  
DEWE W, 2004, P C CHIM FRANC PAR
[3]  
DEWE W, UNPUB CHEMOM INTELL
[4]  
*FOOD DRUG ADM, 2004, PROC AN TECHN PAT IN
[5]   REAPPRAISAL OF HYPOTHESIS-TESTING FOR METHOD VALIDATION - DETECTION OF SYSTEMATIC-ERROR BY COMPARING THE MEANS OF 2 METHODS OR OF 2 LABORATORIES [J].
HARTMANN, C ;
SMEYERSVERBEKE, J ;
PENNINCKX, W ;
VANDERHEYDEN, Y ;
VANKEERBERGHEN, P ;
MASSART, DL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (24) :4491-4499
[6]   Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures -: A SFSTP proposal -: part I [J].
Hubert, P ;
Nguyen-Huu, JJ ;
Boulanger, B ;
Chapuzet, E ;
Chiap, P ;
Cohen, N ;
Compagnon, PA ;
Dewé, W ;
Feinberg, M ;
Lallier, M ;
Laurentie, M ;
Mercier, N ;
Muzard, G ;
Nivet, C ;
Valat, L .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 36 (03) :579-586
[7]  
Hubert P., 2003, STP Pharma Prat Tech Reglementations, V13, P101
[8]  
*ISO, 57252 ISO INT ORG ST
[9]  
*ISO, 57251 ISO INT ORG ST
[10]  
*ISPE, 2003, AN PROC TECHN TRANSF, P23