Information exchange in the NICU: what sources of patient data do physicians prefer to use?

被引:28
作者
Brown, PJ
Borowitz, SM
Novicoff, W
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Pediat, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Hlth Evaluat Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
information exchange; bedside communication; physician documentation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.03.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: There are significant gaps in understanding what sources of patient information physicians utilize in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Objective: We conducted a qualitative study of physicians' self-report of information-seeking behaviors in the NICU of an academic medical center. Methods: The study used a survey design to assess resident and faculty physicians' perceptions of their utilization of written and verbal sources of patient information. Faculty and resident responses were compared by t-tests to assess how perceptions of information-seeking behavior might differ between these two groups. Results: Of the options listed in our survey, the three most commonly reported information sources were: (1) the bedside flowsheet; (2) conversations with resident physicians; and (3) conversations with nurses. Notes written by physicians-especiatty resident notes-were the least reported source of patient information. Conclusions: Physicians' preference to use verbal communication is consistent with prior studies. This study identifies that the bedside flowsheet is also an important source of information, while other written sources-especially resident notes-appear not to be utilized as frequently. Understanding why physicians use or fail to use different sources of patient information may shed light on ways to improve information exchange and reduce medical error in complex settings such as the NICU. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 355
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Expertise and the interpretation of computerized physiological data: implications for the design of computerized monitoring in neonatal intensive care [J].
Alberdi, E ;
Becher, JC ;
Gilhooly, K ;
Hunter, J ;
Logie, R ;
Lyon, A ;
McIntosh, N ;
Reiss, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2001, 55 (03) :191-216
[2]   An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care [J].
Andrews, LB ;
Stocking, C ;
Krizek, T ;
Gottlieb, L ;
Krizek, C ;
Vargish, T ;
Siegler, M .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9048) :309-313
[3]  
Ash JS, 2001, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V89, P294
[4]   Human errors in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit:: a 1-year prospective study [J].
Bracco, D ;
Favre, JB ;
Bissonnette, B ;
Wasserfallen, JB ;
Revelly, JP ;
Ravussin, P ;
Chioléro, R .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (01) :137-145
[5]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[6]   Resident documentation discrepancies in a neonatal intensive care unit [J].
Carroll, AE ;
Tarczy-Hornoch, P ;
O'Reilly, E ;
Christakis, DA .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (05) :976-980
[7]   When conversation is better than computation [J].
Coiera, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2000, 7 (03) :277-286
[8]  
Cook RI, 1994, HUMAN ERROR MED, P255, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203751725-13
[9]   INFORMATION NEEDS IN OFFICE PRACTICE - ARE THEY BEING MET [J].
COVELL, DG ;
UMAN, GC ;
MANNING, PR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 103 (04) :596-599
[10]   Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: A comparative study of intensive care and general care units [J].
Cullen, DJ ;
Sweitzer, BJ ;
Bates, DW ;
Burdick, E ;
Edmondson, A ;
Leape, LL .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (08) :1289-1297