When Does Supervisor Support Encourage Innovative Behavior? Opposite Moderating Effects of General Self-efficacy and Internal Locus of Control

被引:165
作者
Chen, Tingting [1 ]
Li, Fuli [2 ]
Leung, Kwok [3 ]
机构
[1] Lingnan Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; JOB-SATISFACTION; METHOD BIAS; WORK; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/peps.12104
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Previous research is inconclusive about whether supervisor support always increases employee innovative behavior. To address this inconsistency, this research explores how and when supervisor support promotes innovative behavior by examining intrinsic motivation as a mediator and employee general self-efficacy and internal locus of control as boundary conditions. Although these 2 positive self-view variables are similar in terms of their positive effects on a variety of desirable work outcomes, we draw on self-verification theory, which posits that self-confirming information draws more attention, to reason that they exhibit opposite moderating effects on the influence of supervisor support. Based on 2 samples of employees in different industries and locations in China, this moderated mediated model was supported. General self-efficacy showed an enhancement moderating effect, such that it amplified the mediated relationship between supervisor support and employee innovative behavior via intrinsic motivation. In contrast, internal locus of control showed a substitutional moderating effect, such that it weakened this mediated relationship. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 158
页数:36
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF PERSON-JOB COMPATIBILITY ON MANAGERIAL REACTIONS TO ROLE AMBIGUITY [J].
ABDELHALIM, AA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1980, 26 (02) :193-211
[2]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[3]  
Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity
[4]  
Amabile T.M., 1989, Creativity Research Journal, V2, P231, DOI [10.1080/10400418909534321, DOI 10.1080/10400418909534321]
[5]   EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL EVALUATION ON ARTISTIC CREATIVITY [J].
AMABILE, TM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (02) :221-233
[6]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[7]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[8]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[9]   HUMAN AGENCY IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (09) :1175-1184
[10]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182