Phylogenetic analysis of 73 060 taxa corroborates major eukaryotic groups

被引:98
作者
Goloboff, Pablo A. [1 ]
Catalano, Santiago A. [2 ]
Mirande, J. Marcos [2 ]
Szumik, Claudia A. [1 ]
Arias, J. Salvador [1 ]
Kallersjo, Mari [3 ]
Farris, James S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Miguel Lillo, CONICET, INSUE, RA-4000 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[2] Fdn Miguel Lillo, CONICET, RA-4000 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[3] Gothenburgh Bot Garden, SE-41319 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Nat Hist Riksmuseet, Mol Syst Lab, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
GENOME-SCALE DATA; LARGE DATA SETS; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; CLADISTIC-ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGICAL DATA; LEVEL PHYLOGENY; EARLY EVOLUTION; BASAL LINEAGES; PARSIMONY; ANGIOSPERM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00255.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Obtaining a well supported schema of phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of living organisms requires considering as much taxonomic diversity as possible, but the computational cost of calculating large phylogenies has so far been a major obstacle. We show here that the parsimony algorithms implemented in TNT can successfully process the largest phylogenetic data set ever analysed, consisting of molecular sequences and morphology for 73 060 eukaryotic taxa. The trees resulting from molecules alone display a high degree of congruence with the major taxonomic groups, with a small proportion of misplaced species; the combined data set retrieves these groups with even higher congruence. This shows that tree-calculation algorithms effectively retrieve phylogenetic history for very large data sets, and at the same time provides strong corroboration for the major eukaryotic lineages long recognized by taxonomists.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 230
页数:20
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]   The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists [J].
Adl, SM ;
Simpson, AGB ;
Farmer, MA ;
Andersen, RA ;
Anderson, OR ;
Barta, JR ;
Bowser, SS ;
Brugerolle, G ;
Fensome, RA ;
Fredericq, S ;
James, TY ;
Karpov, S ;
Kugrens, P ;
Krug, J ;
Lane, CE ;
Lewis, LA ;
Lodge, J ;
Lynn, DH ;
Mann, DG ;
McCourt, RM ;
Mendoza, L ;
Moestrup, O ;
Mozley-Standridge, SE ;
Nerad, TA ;
Shearer, CA ;
Smirnov, AV ;
Spiegel, FW ;
Taylor, MFJR .
JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 52 (05) :399-451
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 7 WORKSH ALG ENG E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1929, ANN NEW YORK ACAD SC, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1749-6632.1929.TB55192.X
[4]   Relationships of Endemic African Mammals and Their Fossil Relatives Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence [J].
Robert J. Asher ;
Michael J. Novacek ;
Jonathan H. Geisler .
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 2003, 10 (1-2) :131-194
[5]  
BACKELJAU T, 1993, CLADISTICS, V9, P167, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00216.x
[6]   A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data [J].
Baldauf, SL ;
Roger, AJ ;
Wenk-Siefert, I ;
Doolittle, WF .
SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5493) :972-977
[7]  
Baldwin Carole C., 1996, P355, DOI 10.1016/B978-012670950-6/50015-1
[8]   The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae:: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba [J].
Bapteste, E ;
Brinkmann, H ;
Lee, JA ;
Moore, DV ;
Sensen, CW ;
Gordon, P ;
Duruflé, L ;
Gaasterland, T ;
Lopez, P ;
Müller, M ;
Philippe, H .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (03) :1414-1419
[9]   MONOPHYLY AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ARGENTINOID FISHES [J].
BEGLE, DP .
COPEIA, 1992, (02) :350-366
[10]  
Benton M.J., 1988, The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, V1, P295