Computerised estimation of the baseline fetal heart rate in labour: the low frequency line

被引:34
作者
Mongelli, M
Dawkins, R
Chung, T
Sahota, D
Spencer, JAD
Chang, AMZ
机构
[1] CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, SHATIN, NT, HONG KONG
[2] NORTHWICK PK HOSP NHS TRUST, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, HARROW, MIDDX, ENGLAND
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1997年 / 104卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10935.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To develop and evaluate a computerised algorithm for the estimation of the fetal heart rate baseline (low frequency line) during labour. Design Retrospective observational study. Methods Fetal heart rate signals were obtained from women in labour using the Nottingham fetal ECG monitor. The computerised algorithm for the baseline estimation was developed for intrapartum applications and is based on averaging modal fetal heart rate values. Evaluation was carried out on sixty cardiotocographic recordings by 12 experts and by the computer. These estimates were compared with those obtained from the computerised system using paired differences and intraclass correlation. Results The study showed that it is possible to produce a low frequency line from data obtained from intrapartum records. The system could not estimate the low frequency line in four records, whereas experts were also unable to estimate between one and seven tracings. The 95% CI for the paired differences between computer and experts was -12 to 15 bpm, whereas between the experts this was -10 to 10. With the exception of one expert, there was a high concordance between experts and between computer and experts (intraclass correlation > 0.9). Conclusions The performance of this computerised algorithm cannot be distinguished from that of experienced clinicians. There were no significant differences between baseline values obtained by the computerised algorithm and those by the clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1133
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A more objective fetal heart rate baseline estimation [J].
Bernardes, J ;
CostaPereira, A ;
vanGeijn, H ;
PereiraLeite, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :714-715
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   THE PREDICTION OF FETAL ACIDOSIS AT BIRTH BY COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS OF INTRAPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY [J].
CHUNG, TKH ;
MOHAJER, MP ;
YANG, ZJ ;
CHANG, AMZ ;
SAHOTA, DS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06) :454-460
[4]  
DALTON KJ, 1977, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V127, P414
[5]   SYSTEM 8000 - COMPUTERIZED ANTENATAL FHR ANALYSIS [J].
DAWES, GS ;
MOULDEN, M ;
REDMAN, CWG .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (1-2) :47-51
[6]  
Fleiss JL., 1986, The design and analysis of clinical experiments, P17
[7]  
HON EH, 1968, ATLAS FETAL HEART RA, P90
[8]   A MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 17 EXPERTS AND AN INTELLIGENT COMPUTER-SYSTEM FOR MANAGING LABOR USING THE CARDIOTOCOGRAM [J].
KEITH, RDF ;
BECKLEY, S ;
GARIBALDI, JM ;
WESTGATE, JA ;
IFEACHOR, EC ;
GREENE, KR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (09) :688-700
[9]   INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIATION IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTEPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAMS [J].
LOTGERING, FK ;
WALLENBURG, HCS ;
SCHOUTEN, HJA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (06) :701-705
[10]  
Maeda K., 1994, P225