ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

被引:1357
作者
Whiting, Penny [1 ,2 ]
Savovic, Jelena [1 ,2 ]
Higgins, Julian P. T. [1 ,4 ]
Caldwell, Deborah M. [1 ]
Reeves, Barnaby C. [5 ]
Shea, Beverley [6 ]
Davies, Philippa [1 ,2 ]
Kleijnen, Jos [3 ,7 ]
Churchill, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlt, Bristol BS1 2NT, Avon, England
[3] Kleijnen Systemat Reviews Ltd, York YO19 6FD, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirm, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol BS2 8DZ, Avon, England
[6] Community Informat & Epidemiol Technol Inst Popul, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[7] Maastricht Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care CAPHRI, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence; Meta-analysis; Quality; Risk of bias; Systematic review; Tool; QUALITY; METAANALYSIS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). Study Design and Setting: We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold a face-to-face meeting, and refine the tool through piloting. Results: ROBIS is currently aimed at four broad categories of reviews mainly within health care settings: interventions, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology. The target audience of ROBIS is primarily guideline developers, authors of overviews of systematic reviews ("reviews of reviews"), and review authors who might want to assess or avoid risk of bias in their reviews. The tool is completed in three phases: (1) assess relevance (optional), (2) identify concerns with the review process, and (3) judge risk of bias. Phase 2 covers four domains through which bias may be introduced into a systematic review: study eligibility criteria; identification and selection of studies; data collection and study appraisal; and synthesis and findings. Phase 3 assesses the overall risk of bias in the interpretation of review findings and whether this considered limitations identified in any of the phase 2 domains. Signaling questions are included to help judge concerns with the review process (phase 2) and the overall risk of bias in the review (phase 3); these questions flag aspects of review design related to the potential for bias and aim to help assessors judge risk of bias in the review process, results, and conclusions. Conclusions: ROBIS is the first rigorously developed tool designed specifically to assess the risk of bias in systematic reviews. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 234
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bland, J. Martin .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[2]
[Anonymous], STAT METHODS MED RES
[3]
[Anonymous], METHODOLOGICAL EXPEC
[4]
Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[5]
Comparative Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults: A Systematic Review [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Hartung, Daniel ;
Rahman, Basmah ;
Wasson, Ngoc ;
Cottrell, Erika Barth ;
Fu, Rongwei .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (02) :114-123
[6]
Dissemination C.for R., 2009, CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
[7]
Eden J, 2011, FINDING WHAT WORKS IN HEALTH CARE: STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, P1
[8]
Graham R, 2011, CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES WE CAN TRUST, P1
[9]
A tool to assess the quality of a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Lane, Peter W. ;
Anagnostelis, Betsy ;
Anzures-Cabrera, Judith ;
Baker, Nigel F. ;
Cappelleri, Joseph C. ;
Haughie, Scott ;
Hollis, Sally ;
Lewis, Steff C. ;
Moneuse, Patrick ;
Whitehead, Anne .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2013, 4 (04) :351-366
[10]
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis [J].
Jüni, P ;
Witschi, A ;
Bloch, R ;
Egger, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (11) :1054-1060