Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:103
作者
Mahoney, EM
Jurkovitz, CT
Chu, HT
Becker, ER
Culler, S
Kosinski, AS
Robertson, DH
Alexander, C
Nag, S
Cook, JR
Demopoulos, LA
DiBattiste, PM
Cannon, CP
Weintraub, WS
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol,Emory Ctr Outcomes Res, Atlanta, GA 30306 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Merck & Co Inc, W Point, PA USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2002年 / 288卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.288.15.1851
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 18 trial, patients with either unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) treated with the platelet glycoprotein (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitor tirofiban had a significantly reduced rate of major cardiac events at 6 months with an early invasive vs a conservative strategy. Objective To examine total 6-month costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of an invasive vs a conservative strategy. Design Randomized controlled trial including a priori economic end points. Setting Hospitalization for UA/NSTEMI with 6-month follow-up period. Patients A total of 2220 patients with UA/NSTEMI; economic data from 1722 patients at US-non-VA hospitals. Intervention Early invasive strategy with routine catheterization and revascularization as appropriate vs a conservative strategy with catheterization performed only for recurrent ischemia or a positive stress test. Main Outcome Measure Total 6-month costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results The average initial hospitalization costs among those in the invasive strategy group were $15 714 vs $14 047 among those in the conservative stategy group, a difference of $1667 (95% confidence interval [CI], $387-3091). The in-hospital costs were offset significantly at the 6-month follow-up, with an average cost in the invasive group of $6098 vs $7180 in the conservative group, a difference of $1082 (95% Cl, -$2051 to $76). The average total costs at 6 months, including productivity costs, for the invasive group was $21813 vs $21227 for the conservative group, a $586 difference (95% Cl, -$1087 to $2486). The average 6-month costs excluding productivity costs in the invasive group Was $19780 vs $19111 in the conservative group, a difference of $670, 95% Cl; (-$1035 to $2321). Estimated cost per year of life gained for the invasive strategy, based on projected life expectancy, was $12 739 for the base case, and ranged from $8371 to $25769, based on model assumptions. Conclusions In patients with UA/NSTEMI treated with the Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the clinical benefit of an early invasive strategy was achieved with a small increase in cost, yielding favorable projected estimates of cost per year of life gained. These results support the broader use of an early invasive strategy in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1851 / 1858
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of a conservative, ischemia-guided management strategy after non-Q-wave myocardial infarction - Results of a randomized trial
    Barnett, PG
    Chen, S
    Boden, WE
    Chow, B
    Every, NR
    Lavori, PW
    Hlatky, MA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (06) : 680 - 684
  • [2] Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy
    Boden, WE
    O'Rourke, RA
    Crawford, MH
    Blaustein, AS
    Deedwania, PC
    Zoble, RG
    Wexler, LF
    Kleiger, RE
    Pepine, CJ
    Ferry, DR
    Chow, BK
    Lavori, PW
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (25) : 1785 - 1792
  • [3] BRAUNWALD E, 1994, CIRCULATION, V89, P1545
  • [4] ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Braunwald, E
    Antman, EM
    Beasley, JW
    Califf, RM
    Cheitlin, MD
    Hochman, JS
    Jones, RH
    Kereiakes, D
    Kupersmith, J
    Levin, TN
    Pepine, CJ
    Schaeffer, JW
    Smith, EE
    Steward, DE
    Theroux, P
    Gibbons, RJ
    Alpert, JS
    Eagle, KA
    Faxon, DP
    Fuster, V
    Gardner, TJ
    Gregoratos, G
    Russell, RO
    Smith, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) : 970 - 1056
  • [5] BRAUNWALD E, 2002, ACC AHA 2002 GUIDELI
  • [6] Invasive versus conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction following treatment with tirofiban:: Rationale and study design of the international TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial
    Cannon, CP
    Weintraub, WS
    Demopoulos, LA
    Robertson, DH
    Gormley, GJ
    Braunwald, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (06) : 731 - 736
  • [7] Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.
    Cannon, CP
    Weintraub, WS
    Demopoulos, LA
    Vicari, R
    Frey, MJ
    Lakkis, N
    Neumann, FJ
    Robertson, DH
    DeLucca, PT
    DiBattiste, PM
    Gibson, CM
    Braunwald, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (25) : 1879 - 1887
  • [8] Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, V1st ed., DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
  • [9] Feeny D., 1996, QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC, P239
  • [10] FIELLER EC, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P175