Differential effects of muscle contraction from various body parts on neuromagnetic somatosensory responses

被引:56
作者
Lin, YY
Simoes, C
Forss, N
Hari, R
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Low Temp Lab, Brain Res Unit, FIN-02015 Espoo, Finland
[2] Vet Gen Hosp, Neurol Inst, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
evoked field; magnetoencephalography; muscle contraction; somatosensory; human;
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1999.0536
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We studied eight healthy subjects with a whole-scalp 306-channel neuromagnetometer to explore the effect of motor activity from different body parts on somato-sensory responses to left median nerve stimulation. The stimuli produced clear tactile sensation without any motor movement. In the rest condition, the subject had no task. During contraction conditions, the subject had to maintain submaximal isometric contraction in masseter, left deltoid, left thenar, or left tibialis muscles. Short-latency responses from the primary somatosensory cortex did not change during contraction. Responses from both the right (contralateral) and left second somatosensory cortices (SII) were significantly enhanced during contraction of the left thenar muscles. Responses from the left SII were significantly enhanced also during contraction of the left deltoid muscles, but they were decreased during contraction of the masseter and left tibialis anterior muscles. This study implies that SII: activation is modulated by motor activity and that the effect depends on the topographical proximity of the stimulated and contracted body parts, (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   PROPRIOCEPTIVE MODULATION OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING ACTIVE OR PASSIVE FINGER MOVEMENTS IN MAN [J].
ABBRUZZESE, G ;
RATTO, S ;
FAVALE, E ;
ABBRUZZESE, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1981, 44 (10) :942-949
[2]   VELOCITY-DEPENDENT SUPPRESSION OF CUTANEOUS SENSITIVITY DURING MOVEMENT [J].
ANGEL, RW ;
MALENKA, RC .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1982, 77 (02) :266-274
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1954, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC
[4]  
Burton H., 1986, Cerebral cortex, V5, P31, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4613-2149-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-2149-1_2]
[6]   GATING OF THE EARLY COMPONENTS OF THE FRONTAL AND PARIETAL SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN DIFFERENT SENSORY-MOTOR INTERFERENCE MODALITIES [J].
CHERON, G ;
BORENSTEIN, S .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 80 (06) :522-530
[7]   LOCALIZATION, TIMING AND SPECIFICITY OF GATING OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING ACTIVE MOVEMENT IN MAN [J].
COHEN, LG ;
STARR, A .
BRAIN, 1987, 110 :451-467
[8]   MODIFICATIONS OF SOMAESTHETIC CORTICAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING ACTIVE AND PASSIVE MOVEMENTS IN MAN [J].
COQUERY, JM ;
COULMANCE, M ;
LERON, MC .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1972, 33 (03) :269-+
[9]  
FORSS N, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V99, P309
[10]   COMPARISON OF SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED FIELDS TO AIRPUFF AND ELECTRIC STIMULI [J].
FORSS, N ;
SALMELIN, R ;
HARI, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (06) :510-517