The benefits of privatization:: Evidence from Mexico

被引:225
作者
La Porta, R [1 ]
López-De-Silanes, F
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/003355399556250
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Critics of privatization argue that the increased profitability of privatized companies comes at the expense of society. Using data from 97 percent of those nonfinancial firms privatized in Mexico during the period 1983-1991, we study two channels for social losses: (1) increased prices, and (2) layoffs and lower wages. Privatization is followed by a 24-percentage-point increase in the mean ratio of operating income to sales as firms catch up with industry-matched control groups. We estimate that higher product prices explain 5 percent of that increase; transfers from laid-off workers, 31 percent; and productivity gains, the remainder.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1242
页数:50
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, BUREAUCRATS BUSINESS
  • [2] Armstrong M., 1994, Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British experience
  • [3] How does privatization work? Evidence from the Russian shops
    Barberis, N
    Boycko, M
    Shleifer, A
    Tsukanova, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (04) : 764 - 790
  • [4] LESSONS FROM PRIVATIZATION IN BRITAIN - STATE ENTERPRISE BEHAVIOR, PUBLIC CHOICE, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    CAVES, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 13 (02) : 145 - 169
  • [5] Donahue J. D., 1989, PRIVATIZATION DECISI
  • [6] Frydman R., 1999, Q J ECON, V114, P1153
  • [7] Galal A., 1994, Welfare Consequences of Selling Public enterprises: an Empirical Analysis
  • [8] PRIVATIZATION - LESSONS FROM MARKET ECONOMIES
    KIKERI, S
    NELLIS, J
    SHIRLEY, M
    [J]. WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 1994, 9 (02) : 241 - 272
  • [9] Laffont J-J., 1993, THEORY INCENTIVES PR
  • [10] Privatization in the United States
    LopezdeSilanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    Vishny, RW
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 28 (03) : 447 - 471