Effect of Source of DNA on the Quantitative Analysis of Genetically Engineered Traits Using Digital PCR and Real-Time PCR

被引:18
作者
Demeke, Tigst [1 ]
Malabanan, Jemima [2 ]
Holigroski, Michelle [1 ]
Eng, Monika [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Grain Commiss, Grain Res Lab, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Morden, MB, Canada
关键词
EXTRACTION METHODS; QUANTIFICATION; QUALITY; SEEDS; FOOD; RNA;
D O I
10.5740/jaoacint.16-0284
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Seven commercially available DNA extraction kits were compared with a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method to determine the suitability of the extracted DNA for RainDrop digital PCR (dPCR) and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) quantification of OXY235 canola, FP967 flax, and DP305423 soybean (spiked at the 0.1% level). For the kits, the highest amount of DNA extracted from a 0.2 g sample was obtained using OmniPrep for Plant for flax and DNeasy mericon Food for canola and soybean. For canola, DNA extracted with the Fast ID Genomic DNA Extraction Kit, FastDNA Spin Kit, GM Quicker 2, NucleoSpin Food, and DNeasy mericon Food was suitable for dPCR and RT-PCR. For flax, DNA extracted with Fast ID, FastDNA Spin Kit, OmniPrep for Plant, and NucleoSpin Food was suitable for RT-PCR. However, only Fast ID yielded DNA suitable for dPCR. For soybean, DNA extracted with five and six of the seven DNA extraction kits was suitable for dPCR and RT-PCR, respectively. Overall, Fast ID provided reliable results regardless of species or analysis method used. Canola, flax, and soybean DNA extracted with the CTAB method and then purified were suitable for both dPCR and RT-PCR. This is the first report showing the effect of different DNA extraction methods on the absolute quantification of genetically engineered traits using dPCR.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 498
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INV PLANT DNAZOL REA
[2]  
Brookes G., 2014, GM CROPS GLOBAL SOCI
[3]   Modified method for combined DNA and RNA isolation from peanut and other oil seeds [J].
Dang, Phat M. ;
Chen, Charles Y. .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 40 (02) :1563-1568
[4]   Absolute quantification of genetically engineered traits with droplet digital PCR: Effect of DNA treatments and spiking with non-target DNA [J].
Demeke, Tigst ;
Holigroski, Michelle ;
Eng, Monika ;
Xing, Juan .
FOOD CONTROL, 2016, 68 :105-111
[5]   Influence of Amount of Starting Material for DNA Extraction on Detection of Low-Level Presence of Genetically Engineered Traits [J].
Demeke, Tigst ;
Anh Phan ;
Ratnayaka, Indira ;
Holigroski, Michelle ;
Jenkins, G. Ronald .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2014, 62 (19) :4349-4358
[6]   Assessment of DNA extraction methods for PCR testing of discontinued or unapproved biotech events in single seeds of canola, flax and soybean [J].
Demeke, Tigst ;
Ratnayaka, Indira ;
Holigroski, Michelle ;
Anh Phan .
FOOD CONTROL, 2012, 24 (1-2) :44-49
[7]   Multiplex Quantification of 12 European Union Authorized Genetically Modified Maize Lines with Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction [J].
Dobnik, David ;
Spilsberg, Bjorn ;
Kosir, Alexandra Bogozalec ;
Holst-Jensen, Arne ;
Zel, Jana .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 (16) :8218-8226
[8]  
FU W, 2015, NAT SCI REP, V5, P12715, DOI DOI 10.1038/SREP12715
[9]   Comparative study of DNA extraction methods for soybean derived food products [J].
Mafra, Isabel ;
Silva, Susana A. ;
Moreira, Elsa J. M. O. ;
da Silva, Carla S. Ferreira ;
Beatriz, M. ;
Oliveira, P. P. .
FOOD CONTROL, 2008, 19 (12) :1183-1190
[10]   Simultaneously extracting DNA, RNA, and protein using kits: Is sample quantity or quality prejudiced? [J].
Mathieson, William ;
Thomas, Gerry A. .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 433 (01) :10-18