A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction

被引:182
作者
Blakeslee, B [1 ]
McCourt, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Psychol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
brightness induction; White effect; simultaneous brightness contrast; grating induction;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00119-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Blakeslee and McCourt ((1997) Vision Research, 37, 2849-2869) demonstrated that a multiscale array of two-dimensionaldifference-of-Gaussian (DOG) filters provided a simple but powerful model for explaining a number of seemingly complex features of grating induction (GI), while simultaneously encompassing salient features of brightness induction in simultaneous brightness contrast (SBC), brightness assimilation and Hermann Grid stimuli. The DOG model (and isotropic contrast models in general) cannot, however, account for another important group of brightness effects which includes the White effect (White (1979) Perception, 8, 413-416) and the demonstrations of Todorovic ((1997) Perception, 26, 379-395). This paper introduces an oriented DOG (ODOG) model which differs from the DOG model in that the filters are anisotropic and their outputs are pooled nonlinearly. The ODOG model qualitatively predicts the appearance of the test patches in the White effect, the Todorovic demonstration, GI and SBC, while quantitatively predicting the relative magnitudes of these brightness effects as measured psychophysically using brightness matching. The model also accounts for both the smooth transition in test patch brightness seen in the White effect (White & White (1985) Vision Research, 25, 1331-1335) when the relative phase of the test patch is varied relative to the inducing grating, and for the spatial variation of brightness across the test patch as measured using point-by-point brightness matching. Finally, the model predicts intensive aspects of brightness induction measured in a series of Todorovic stimuli as the arms of the test crosses are lengthened (Pessoa, Baratoff, Neumann & Todorokov (1998) Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Supplement, 39, S159), but fails in one condition. Although it is concluded that higher-level perceptual grouping factors may play a role in determining brightness in this instance, in general the psychophysical results and ODOG modeling argue strongly that the induced brightness phenomena of SEC, GI, the White effect and the Todorovic demonstration, primarily reflect early-stage cortical filtering operations in the visual system. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4361 / 4377
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION AND THE JUDGMENT OF BRIGHTNESS [J].
ADELSON, EH .
SCIENCE, 1993, 262 (5142) :2042-2044
[2]   PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION EVOKES SIMULTANEOUS LIGHTNESS CONTRAST [J].
AGOSTINI, T ;
PROFFITT, DR .
PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (03) :263-272
[3]  
[Anonymous], INVESTIG OPHTHALMO S
[4]   LIGHTNESS, BRIGHTNESS, AND BRIGHTNESS CONTRAST .1. ILLUMINANCE VARIATION [J].
AREND, LE ;
SPEHAR, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1993, 54 (04) :446-456
[5]   LIGHTNESS, BRIGHTNESS, AND BRIGHTNESS CONTRAST .2. REFLECTANCE VARIATION [J].
AREND, LE ;
SPEHAR, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1993, 54 (04) :457-468
[6]   Similar mechanisms underlie simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction [J].
Blakeslee, B ;
McCourt, ME .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (20) :2849-2869
[7]   LIGHTNESS PERCEPTION CAN BE AFFECTED BY SURFACE CURVATURE FROM STEREOPSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, D ;
FRISBY, JP ;
FREEMAN, J .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (08) :869-881
[8]   RELATION OF INCREMENT THRESHOLDS TO BRIGHTNESS AND LUMINANCE [J].
CORNSWEE.TN ;
TELLER, DY .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1965, 55 (10P1) :1303-&
[9]  
DeValois R.L., 1988, Spatial vision
[10]   CONTOURS AND CONTRAST - RESPONSES OF MONKEY LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS CELLS TO LUMINANCE AND COLOR FIGURES [J].
DEVALOIS, RL ;
PEASE, PL .
SCIENCE, 1971, 171 (3972) :694-&