Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency

被引:1254
作者
Nolte, G [1 ]
Bai, O [1 ]
Wheaton, L [1 ]
Mari, Z [1 ]
Vorbach, S [1 ]
Hallett, M [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, Human Motor Control Sect, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
coherence; EEG; connectivity; motor control; volume conduction; time-lag;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The main obstacle in interpreting EEG/MEG data in terms of brain connectivity is the fact that because of volume conduction, the activity of a single brain source can be observed in many channels. Here, we present an approach which is insensitive to false connectivity arising from volume conduction. Methods: We show that the (complex) coherency of non-interacting sources is necessarily real and, hence, the imaginary part of coherency provides an excellent candidate to study brain interactions. Although the usual magnitude and phase of coherency contain the same information as the real and imaginary parts, we argue that the Cartesian representation is far superior for studying brain interactions. The method is demonstrated for EEG measurements of voluntary finger movement. Results: We found: (a) from 5 s before to movement onset a relatively weak interaction around 20 Hz between left and right motor areas where the contralateral side leads the ipsilateral side; and (b) approximately 2-4 s after movement, a stronger interaction also at 20 Hz in the opposite direction. Conclusions: It is possible to reliably detect brain interaction during movement from EEG data. Significance: The method allows unambiguous detection of brain interaction from rhythmic EEG/MEG data. (C) 2004 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2292 / 2307
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   An extended difference of coherence test for comparing and combining several independent coherence estimates: Theory and application to the study of motor units and physiological tremor [J].
Amjad, AM ;
Halliday, DM ;
Rosenberg, JR ;
Conway, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1997, 73 (01) :69-79
[2]   Lack of bilateral coherence of post-movement central beta oscillations in the human electroencephalogram [J].
Andrew, C ;
Pfurtscheller, G .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1999, 273 (02) :89-92
[3]   Partial directed coherence:: a new concept in neural structure determination [J].
Baccalá, LA ;
Sameshima, K .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2001, 84 (06) :463-474
[4]   Electromagnetic brain mapping [J].
Baillet, S ;
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2001, 18 (06) :14-30
[5]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[6]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[7]   Spectral phase estimates in the setting of multidirectional coupling [J].
Cassidy, M ;
Brown, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2003, 127 (01) :95-103
[8]   Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality:: application to epileptic EEG signals [J].
Chávez, M ;
Martinerie, J ;
Le Van Quyen, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2003, 124 (02) :113-128
[9]   COMMON REFERENCE COHERENCE DATA ARE CONFOUNDED BY POWER AND PHASE EFFECTS [J].
FEIN, G ;
RAZ, J ;
BROWN, FF ;
MERRIN, EL .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (06) :581-584
[10]   Do changes in coherence always reflect changes in functional coupling? [J].
Florian, G ;
Andrew, C ;
Pfurtscheller, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 106 (01) :87-91