Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial

被引:161
作者
Holbrook, Anne [1 ]
Thabane, Lehana [2 ]
Keshavjee, Karim [5 ]
Dolovich, Lisa [3 ]
Bernstein, Bob [6 ]
Chan, David [3 ]
Troyan, Sue [2 ]
Foster, Gary [2 ]
Gerstein, Hertzel [4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Ctr Evaluat Med, Div Clin Pharmacol & Therapeut, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada
[5] InfoClin, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Family Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS; CONTINUITY; EDUCATION; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; DISEASE; PEOPLE; RISK;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.081272
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a complex disease with serious complications. Electronic decision support, providing information that is shared and discussed by both patient and physician, encourages timely interventions and may improve the management of this chronic disease. However, it has rarely been tested in community-based primary care. Methods: In this pragmatic randomized trial, we randomly assigned adult primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to receive the intervention or usual care. The intervention involved shared access by the primary care provider and the patient to a Web-based, colour-coded diabetes tracker, which provided sequential monitoring values for 13 diabetes risk factors, their respective targets and brief, prioritized messages of advice. The primary outcome measure was a process composite score. Secondary outcomes included clinical composite scores, quality of life, continuity of care and usability. The outcome assessors were blinded to each patient's intervention status. Results: We recruited sequentially 46 primary care providers and then 511 of their patients (mean age 60.7 [standard deviation 12.5] years). Mean follow-up was 5.9 months. The process composite score was significantly better for patients in the intervention group than for control patients (difference 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.75, p<0.001); 61.7% (156/253) of patients in the intervention group, compared with 42.6% (110/258) of control patients, showed improvement (difference 19.1%, p<0.001). The clinical composite score also had significantly more variables with improvement for the intervention group (0.59, 95% CI 0.09-1.10, p=0.02), including significantly greater declines in blood pressure (-3.95 mm Hg systolic and -2.38 mm Hg diastolic) and glycated hemoglobin (-0.2%). Patients in the intervention group reported greater satisfaction with their diabetes care. Interpretation: A shared electronic decision-support system to support the primary care of diabetes improved the process of care and some clinical markers of the quality of diabetes care. (ClinicalTrials. gov trial register no. NCT00813085.)
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 44
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2007, DIABETES CARE, V30, P4, DOI [DOI 10.2337/DC07-S004, 10.2337/dc07-S004]
[2]
[Anonymous], PREV COSTS DIAB
[3]
[Anonymous], CAN J DIABETES
[4]
[Anonymous], 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[5]
Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care [J].
Balas, EA ;
Krishna, S ;
Kretschmer, RA ;
Cheek, TR ;
Lobach, DF ;
Boren, SA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (06) :610-621
[6]
The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes - Diabetes-39 [J].
Boyer, JG ;
Earp, JAL .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (05) :440-453
[7]
Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care [J].
Branger, PJ ;
van't Hooft, A ;
van der Wouden, JC ;
Moorman, PW ;
van Bemmel, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 53 (2-3) :133-142
[8]
Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis [J].
Brown, LC ;
Johnson, JA ;
Majumdar, SR ;
Tsuyuki, RT ;
McAlister, FA .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 171 (10) :1189-1192
[9]
*CAN DIAB ASS, 2003, 2003 CLIN PRACT GUID
[10]
Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care [J].
Chaudhry, Basit ;
Wang, Jerome ;
Wu, Shinyi ;
Maglione, Margaret ;
Mojica, Walter ;
Roth, Elizabeth ;
Morton, Sally C. ;
Shekelle, Paul G. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (10) :742-752