Active site architecture of polymorphic forms of human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 accounts for their enantioselectivity and disparate activity in the glutathione conjugation of 7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha,10 alpha-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene

被引:82
作者
Hu, X
ODonnell, R
Srivastava, SK
Xia, H
Zimniak, P
Nanduri, B
Bleicher, RJ
Awasthi, S
Awasthi, YC
Ji, XH
Singh, SV
机构
[1] MERCY HOSP,MERCY CANC INST,CANC RES LAB,PITTSBURGH,PA 15219
[2] NCI,FREDERICK CANC RES & DEV CTR,ABL BASIC RES PROGRAM,FREDERICK,MD 21702
[3] UNIV ARKANSAS MED SCI HOSP,DEPT MED,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72205
[4] UNIV ARKANSAS MED SCI HOSP,DEPT BIOCHEM & MOL BIOL,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72205
[5] MCCLELLAN VA HOSP MED RES,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72205
[6] UNIV TEXAS,MED BRANCH,DEPT INTERNAL MED,GALVESTON,TX 77555
[7] UNIV TEXAS,MED BRANCH,DEPT HUMAN BIOL CHEM & GENET,GALVESTON,TX 77555
关键词
D O I
10.1006/bbrc.1997.6777
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, we demonstrate that the active site architecture of the human glutathione (GSH) S-transferase Pi (GSTP1-1) accounts for its enantioselectivity in the GSH conjugation of 7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha,10 alpha-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a) pyrene (anti-BPDE), the ultimate carcinogen of benzo(a)pyrene. Furthermore, we report that the two polymorphic forms of human GSTP1-1, differing in their primary structure by a single amino acid in position 104, have disparate activity toward (+)-anti-BPDE, which can also be rationalized in terms of their active site structures. When concentration of (+)-anti-BPDE, which among four BPDE isomers is the most potent carcinogen, was varied and GSH concentration was kept constant at 2 mM (saturating concentration), both forms of hGSTP1-1 [hGSTP1-1(V104) and hGSTP1-1(I104)] obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The V-max of GSH conjugation of (+)-anti-BPDE was approximately 3.4 fold higher for hGSTP1-1(V104) than for hGSTP1-1(I104). Adherence to Michaelis-Menten kinetics was also observed for both isoforms when (-)-anti-BPDE, which is a weak carcinogen, was used as the variable substrate. However, (-)-anti-BPDE was a relatively poor substrate for both isoforms as compared with (+)-anti-BPDE. Moreover, there were no significant differences between hGSTP1-1(V104) and hGSTP1-1(I104) in either V-max or K-m for (-)-anti-BPDE. The mechanism of differences in kinetic properties and enantioselectivity of hGSTP1-1 variants toward anti-BPDE was investigated by modeling of the two proteins with conjugation product molecules in their active sites. Molecular modeling studies revealed that the differences in catalytic properties of hGSTP1-1 variants as well as the enantioselectivity of hGSTP1-1 in the GSH conjugation of anti-BPDE can be rationalized in terms of the architecture of their active sites. Our results suggest that the population polymorphism of hGSTP1-1 variants with disparate enzyme activities may, at least in part, account for the differential susceptibility of individuals to carcinogens such as anti-BPDE and possibly other similar carcinogens. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 428
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条