Trust in information sources: seeking information from people, documents, and virtual agents

被引:87
作者
Hertzum, M [1 ]
Andersen, HHK [1 ]
Andersen, V [1 ]
Hansen, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] Riso Natl Lab, Ctr Human Machine Interact, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
trust; information-seeking behaviour; information sources; personified virtual agents; usability criteria;
D O I
10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00023-1
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 [计算机科学与技术];
摘要
The notion of trust has been virtually absent from most work on how people assess and choose their information sources. Based on two empirical cases this study shows that software engineers and users of e-commerce websites devote a lot of attention to considerations about the trustworthiness of their sources, which include people, documents, and virtual agents. In the project-based software engineering environment trust tends to be a collaborative issue and the studied software engineers normally know their sources first-hand or have them recommended by colleagues. Outside this network people are cautious and alert to even feeble cues about source trustworthiness. For example, users of e-commerce websites-generally perceived as single-user environments-react rather strongly to the visual appearance of virtual agents, though this is clearly a surface attribute. Across the two cases people need access to their sources in ways that enable them to assess source trustworthiness, access alone is not enough. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 599
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the Flow of Technology -Technological Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within R
[2]
ANDERSEN HHK, 2001, P UM2001 WORKSH EMP, P51
[3]
ANDERSEN V, 2002, R1264EN RIS NAT LAB
[4]
[Anonymous], 1994, COMMUNICATION ENG LI
[5]
[Anonymous], 1996, TRUST ORG FRONTIERS
[6]
[Anonymous], 1998, 924111 ISO
[7]
[Anonymous], 1998, ACAD MANAGEMENT REV
[8]
Barber B, 1983, The logic and limits of trust, V96
[9]
Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison [J].
Barry, CL ;
Schamber, L .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1998, 34 (2-3) :219-236
[10]
MEASURING USABILITY AS QUALITY OF USE [J].
BEVAN, N .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 1995, 4 (02) :115-130