Determining a significant change in protein expression with DeCyder™ during a pair-wise comparison using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

被引:118
作者
Karp, NA
Kreil, DP
Lilley, KS
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Biochem, Cambridge CB2 1QW, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Genet Inference Grp, Cavendish Lab, Cambridge CB2 1QW, England
关键词
diffference gel electrophoresis; differential in-gel analysis; expression proteomics; normalization;
D O I
10.1002/pmic.200300681
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) is a tool for measuring changes in protein expression between samples involving pre-electrophoretic labeling with cyanine dyes. Here we assess a common method to analyze DIGE data using the DeCyder(TM) software system. Experimental error was studied by a series of same sample comparisons. Aliquots of sample were labeled with N-hydroxyl succinimidyl ester-derivatives of Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5 dyes and run together on one gel. This allowed assessment of how experimental error influenced differential expression analysis. Bias in the log volume ratios was observed, which could be explained by differences in dye background. Further complications are caused by significant gel-to-gel variation in the spot volume ratio distributions. Using DeCyder(TM) alone results in an inability to define ratio thresholds for 90 or 95% confidence. An alternative normalization method was thus applied which resulted in improved data distribution and allowed greater sensitivity in analysis. When combined with a standardizing function, this allowed gel-independent thresholds for 90% confidence. The new approach, detailed here, represents a method to greatly improve the success of DIGE data analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1432
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard [J].
Alban, A ;
David, SO ;
Bjorkesten, L ;
Andersson, C ;
Sloge, E ;
Lewis, S ;
Currie, I .
PROTEOMICS, 2003, 3 (01) :36-44
[2]  
*AM BIOSC, ETTT DIGE US MAN
[3]  
Asirvatham VS, 2002, PROTEOMICS, V2, P960, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200208)2:8<960::AID-PROT960>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-2
[5]  
BERGH GVD, 2003, ELECTROPHORESIS, V24, P1471
[6]   Estimation of transformation parameters for microarray data [J].
Durbin, B ;
Rocke, DM .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (11) :1360-1367
[7]  
Durbin B P, 2002, Bioinformatics, V18 Suppl 1, pS105
[8]   2D or not 2D [J].
Fey, SJ ;
Larsen, PM .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (01) :26-33
[9]   Evaluation of two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis for proteomic expression analysis of a model breast cancer cell system [J].
Gharbi, S ;
Gaffney, P ;
Yang, A ;
Zvelebil, MJ ;
Cramer, R ;
Waterfield, MD ;
Timms, JF .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2002, 1 (02) :91-98
[10]   Proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under metal stress by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis [J].
Hu, Y ;
Wang, G ;
Chen, GYJ ;
Fu, X ;
Yao, SQ .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2003, 24 (09) :1458-1470