Alternative retirement income strategies: A cohort analysis of lifetime redistribution

被引:7
作者
Atkinson, ME
Creedy, J
Knox, DM
机构
[1] University of Melbourne, Parkville
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4932.1996.tb00944.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper compares the lifetime redistribution and progressivity, within a cohort of males, of two retirement income systems. The current government strategy in Australia is to increase the role of occupational superannuation and maintain a means-tested age pension. The Institute of Actuaries of Australia has recommended a universal pension with a corresponding smaller role for occupational superannuation. In terms of lifetime inequality and progressivity measures, it is found that there is not a substantial difference between the two systems. Other issues, such as the benefit choice at retirement and differential mortality, are found to be more important in determining the lifetime redistributive impact of a retirement income strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 106
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL SECURITY AUST
  • [2] ATKINSON ME, 1994, 9 CTR ACT STUD RES
  • [3] ATKINSON ME, 1995, AUSTR EC REV, V4, P15
  • [4] ATKINSON ME, 1994, 13 CTR ACT STUD RES
  • [5] TAXES, RETIREMENT TRANSFERS, AND ANNUITIES
    BATEMAN, H
    KINGSTON, G
    PIGGOTT, J
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 1993, 69 (206) : 274 - 284
  • [6] INDIRECT TAX EXEMPTIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF LIFETIME INCOME - A SIMULATION ANALYSIS
    CAMERON, L
    CREEDY, J
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 1995, 71 (212) : 77 - 87
  • [7] CREEDY J, 1991, J IND RELAT, P41
  • [8] CREEDY J, 1982, STATE PENSIONS BRITA
  • [9] Creedy J., 1996, FISCAL POLICY SOCIAL
  • [10] CREEDY J, 1995, 452 U MELB DEP EC RE