Empiric treatment with high and standard dose of omeprazole in general practice: Two-week randomized placebo-controlled trial and 12-month follow-up of health-care consumption

被引:29
作者
Meineche-Schmidt, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Practice, Klampenborg, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30089.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Patients with acid-related symptoms in general practice are often treated empirically with a standard dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The effect of higher doses is not known. The study compared the immediate symptom relieving as well as the long-term effect of standard and double dose of omeprazole in such patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms, normally treated by the general practitioner with PPIs or H2-blockers were randomized to treatment with omeprazole 40 mg, 20 mg, or placebo in the morning for 2 wk. Patients with alarm symptoms, IBS, and PPI-treated patients were excluded. Dyspeptic symptoms and Helicobacter pylori status were recorded. The study endpoint was complete relief of the dyspeptic symptoms, which initiated the consultation. Relapse rates and health-care consumption were recorded during 12-month observation. RESULTS: Eight hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomized. Complete relief of the predominant symptom was obtained by 66%, 63%, and 35% in patients treated with omeprazole 40 mg, 20 mg, and placebo, respectively. No difference was found comparing H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. Relapse rates were high and health-care consumption during 12 months was related to the treatment outcome, but not to the omeprazole dose or the H. pylori status. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, omeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg were equally and significantly better in relieving acid-related symptoms; the numbers needed-to-treat (NNT) were 3.2 (40 mg) and 3.7 (20 mg). Relief of the dyspeptic complaint was followed by significantly reduced health-care consumption during 12-month observation.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1058
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Andersen LP, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V143, P1157, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008694
[2]   Prescribing patients for dyspepsia in primary care: A prospective study of selected general practitioners [J].
Bodger, K ;
Daly, MJ ;
Heatley, RV .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 10 (06) :889-895
[3]   Treating Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia:: the Canadian adult dyspepsia empiric treatment -: Helicobacter pylori positive (CADET-Hp) randomised controlled trial [J].
Chiba, N ;
van Zanten, SJOV ;
Sinclair, P ;
Ferguson, RA ;
Escobedo, S ;
Grace, E .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7344) :1012-+
[4]  
Folkersen B H, 1997, Ugeskr Laeger, V159, P3777
[5]  
GILVARRY J, 1997, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V32, P1183
[6]  
Goves J, 1998, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V12, P147
[7]   General practitioners approach to dyspepsia - Survey of consultation frequencies, treatment, and investigations [J].
Heikkinen, M ;
Pikkarainen, P ;
Takala, J ;
Julkunen, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 (07) :648-653
[8]  
HENDEL J, 1996, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V8, P413
[9]   Does fear of serious disease predict consulting behaviour amongst patients with dyspepsia in general practice? [J].
Howell, S ;
Talley, NJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 11 (08) :881-886
[10]   CLINICAL INTERPRETATION - THE HERMENEUTICS OF MEDICINE [J].
LEDER, D .
THEORETICAL MEDICINE, 1990, 11 (01) :9-24