Finding common ground in team-based qualitative research using the convergent interviewing method

被引:48
作者
Driedger, S. Michelle [1 ]
Gallois, Cindy
Sanders, Carrie B.
Santesso, Nancy
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Social Res Commun, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Effect Consumer Project, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
convergent interviewing method; epistemology; ontology; network analysis; effective health consumer;
D O I
10.1177/1049732306289705
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Research councils, agencies, and researchers recognize the benefits of team-based health research. However, researchers involved in large-scale team-based research projects face multiple challenges as they seek to identify epistemological and ontological common ground. Typically, these challenges occur between quantitative and qualitative researchers but can occur between qualitative researchers, particularly when the project involves multiple disciplinary perspectives. The authors use the convergent interviewing technique in their multidisciplinary research project to overcome these challenges. This technique assists them in developing common epistemological and ontological ground while enabling swift and detailed data collection and analysis. Although convergent interviewing is a relatively new method described primarily in marketing research, it compares and contrasts well with grounded theory and other techniques. The authors argue that this process provides a rigorous method to structure and refine research projects and requires researchers to identify and be accountable for developing a common epistemological and ontological position.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1157
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Alvesson M., 2000, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG
[2]
The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Gosling, A ;
Weinman, J ;
Marteau, T .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 31 (03) :597-606
[3]
Berg B., 2001, QUALITATIVE RES METH, DOI DOI 10.2307/1317652
[4]
Carson D., 2001, QUALITATIVE RES MARK
[5]
CHARMAZ K, 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P675
[6]
Dick B., 1990, CONVERGENT INTERVIEW
[7]
DICK B, 2002, CONVERGENT INTERVIEW
[8]
Fine GA., 1983, SYMB INTERACT, V6, P97, DOI DOI 10.1525/SI.1983.6.1.97
[9]
THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE [J].
FLANAGAN, JC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1954, 51 (04) :327-358
[10]
GILCHRIST VJ, 1992, RES METH PR, V3, P70