The performance of perturb and observe and incremental conductance maximum power point tracking method under dynamic weather conditions

被引:191
作者
Ishaque, Kashif [1 ]
Salam, Zainal [2 ]
Lauss, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Karachi Inst Econ & Technol, Karachi 75190, Pakistan
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Elect Engn, Skudai 81310, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
[3] AIT, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Dynamic efficiency; Incremental conductance (IC); Maximum power point tracking (MPPT); Perturb and observe (P&O); Photovoltaic (PV) system; PV; TIO2; MPPT; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; ARRAYS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.054
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the rapid growth of photovoltaic (PV) systems, stringent standards are envisaged to ensure the safe and efficient generation of power. Therefore, the performance of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) element in PV system under dynamic environmental conditions is very crucial. Hence, this paper evaluates the performance of perturb and observe (P&O) and incremental conductance (IC) MPPT technique on the basis of European Efficiency Test, EN 50530, which is specifically devised for the dynamic performance of PV system. Both techniques are implemented in direct control structure and buck-boost converter is used as MPPT converter. Experiments are conducted using a custom designed PV array simulator. Results reveal that both methods yield almost equivalent dynamic MPPT efficiency. However, in average, the performance of IC method is found to be slightly better that gives 98.5% efficiency compare to 98.3% in P&O. It is also seen that the performance of IC method is very sensitive to its perturbation size, especially at low insolation levels. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 236
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Comparison of direct maximum power point tracking algorithms using EN 50530 dynamic test procedure [J].
Andrejasic, T. ;
Jankovec, M. ;
Topic, M. .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2011, 5 (04) :281-286
[2]   ENERGY-LOSSES IN PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS [J].
ANIS, WR ;
NOUR, MAS .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 36 (11) :1107-1113
[3]  
[Anonymous], APPL POW EL C IAPEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, US MAN PROGR PHOT AR
[5]   Comparison of ZnO interlayers in inverted bulk heterojunction solar cells [J].
Bekci, D. Rana ;
Karsli, Adem ;
Cakir, A. Cagatay ;
Sarica, Hizir ;
Guloglu, Alper ;
Gunes, Serap ;
Erten-Ela, Sule .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 96 :417-421
[6]   Global overview on grid-parity [J].
Breyer, Christian ;
Gerlach, Alexander .
PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2013, 21 (01) :121-136
[7]  
Bruendlinger Roland., 2006, Proc. 21st EUPVSEC, P2157
[8]  
Brundlinger, 2009, 24 EUR PHOT SOL EN C
[9]   Soft-Switching Converter With HF Transformer for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems [J].
Cacciato, Mario ;
Consoli, Alfio ;
Attanasio, Rosario ;
Gennaro, Francesco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (05) :1678-1686
[10]   Preparation of lead-free nanoglass frit powder for crystalline silicon solar cells [J].
Che, Quande ;
Yang, Hongxing ;
Lu, Lin ;
Wang, Yuanhao .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 112 :657-662