Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy

被引:153
作者
Kendall, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Div Child & Family Nursing, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/01939459922044162
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 [护理学];
摘要
The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences between two approaches to grounded theory research: grounded theory as espoused by Glaser and grounded theory as espoused by Strauss and Corbin. The focus of the article is the controversy surrounding the use of axial coding. The author proposes a resolution to the controversy by suggesting that one does not need to view either approach as right or wrong; rather the qualitative and grounded theory researcher can choose on approach, and that choice is based on the goal of the researcher's study. Examples of both approaches, from the author's research study on the experiences of living in a family with a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 757
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1992, EMERGENCE VS FORCING
[2]
Blumer H., 1986, SYMB INTERACT
[3]
Bowers B J, 1988, NLN Publ, P33
[4]
Glaser B. G., 1978, [No title captured]
[5]
Glaser Barney, 1965, Awareness of Dying
[6]
Glaser Barney G., 1965, AWARENESS DYING
[7]
[9]
Kendall J, 1997, J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs, V10, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6171.1997.tb00419.x
[10]
Kendall J, 1989, J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, V2, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6171.1989.tb00380.x