Electrokinetic remediation of a Cu contaminated red soil by conditioning catholyte pH with different enhancing chemical reagents

被引:192
作者
Zhou, DM [1 ]
Deng, CF [1 ]
Cang, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, State Key Lab Soil & Sustainable Agr, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
red soil; electrokinetic remediation; Cu; enhancing reagents; electrochemistry;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.02.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of enhancement reagents on the efficiency of electrokinetic remediation of Cu contaminated red soil is evaluated. The enhancement agents were a mix of organic acids, including lactic acid + NaOH, HAc-NaAc and HAc-NaAc + EDTA. The soil was prepared to an initial Cu concentration of 438 mg kg(-1) by incubating the soil with CuSO4 solution in a flooded condition for I month. Sequential extraction showed that Cu was partitioned in the soil as follows: 195 mg kg(-1) as water soluble and exchangeable, 71 mg kg(-1) as carbonate bound and 105 mg kg(-1) as Fe and Mn oxides. The results indicate that neutralizing the catholyte pH maintains a lower soil pH compared to that without electrokinetic treatment. The electric currents varied depending upon the conditioning solutions and increased with an increasing applied voltage potential. The electroosmotic flow rate changed significantly when different conditioning enhancing reagents were used. It was observed that lactic acid + NaOH treatments resulted in higher soil electric conductivities than HAc-NaAc and HAc-NaAc + EDTA treatments. Ultimately, enhancement by lactic acid + NaOH resulted in highest removal efficiency (81% Cu removal) from the red soil. The presence of EDTA did not enhance Cu removal efficiencies from the red soil, because EDTA complexed with Cu to form negatively charge complexes, which slowly migrated toward the anode chamber retarding Cu2+ transport towards the cathode. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Electrokinetic remediation .1. Pilot-scale tests with lead-spiked kaolinite [J].
Acar, YB ;
Alshawabkeh, AN .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (03) :173-185
[2]   PRINCIPLES OF ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION [J].
ACAR, YB ;
ALSHAWABKEH, AN .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (13) :2638-+
[3]  
*AGR COMM SOIL SCI, 1983, ROUT METH SOIL AGR A, P451
[4]   Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction [J].
Alshawabkeh, AN ;
Yeung, AT ;
Bricka, MR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (01) :27-35
[5]  
Bonilla A., 2000, Land Contamination & Reclamation, V8, P33
[6]   PB(II) REMOVAL FROM KAOLINITE BY ELECTROKINETICS [J].
HAMED, J ;
ACAR, YB ;
GALE, RJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (02) :241-271
[7]   Influence of current density and pH on electrokinetics [J].
Hamed, JT ;
Bhadra, A .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1997, 55 (1-3) :279-294
[8]  
Hansen HK, 1997, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V70, P67, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199709)70:1<67::AID-JCTB662>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-V
[10]   Removal of heavy metals from sandy soil using CEHIXM process [J].
Karim, MA ;
Khan, LI .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2001, 81 (1-2) :83-102