Shorebird - Prey interactions in South Carolina coastal soft sediments

被引:25
作者
Weber, LM
Haig, SM
机构
[1] CLEMSON UNIV, DEPT BIOL SCI, CLEMSON, SC 29634 USA
[2] S CAROLINA COOPERAT FISH & WILDLIFE RES UNIT, CLEMSON, SC 29634 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/z97-031
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
We investigated the simultaneous influence of benthic prey (primarily insect larvae, oligochaetes, and polychaetes) on spring-migrating shorebirds (Charadriiformes) and shorebirds on prey in brackish managed wetlands of South Carolina. We proposed that positive correlations between shorebird and prey densities and between prey reduction and shorebird density might result in a negative feedback loop. The loop would be characterized by shorebird redistribution over time and equalization of shorebird and prey densities (and biomass) across the site. In support of the feedback loop (i) then were positive correlations between shorebird and prey densities (and biomass) early in migration; (ii) shorebird predation was responsible for declines of 49% in prey density and 50% in prey biomass in a shorebird exclosure experiment, with shorebird density positively correlated with prey decline in open plots; (iii) there was equalization of prey biomass across the site, and relative prey species abundance appeared to become more equal. Contrary to predictions, shorebirds did not redistribute after prey reduction, and patchiness of shorebird and prey densities persisted across the site. This failure was attributed to high prey density, even at the season's end, and high water depths. There were no confounding indirect trophic-level effects.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 252
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], SHOREBIRDS MIGRATION
[3]   EFFECTS OF PREY DENSITY AND SITE CHARACTER ON ESTUARY USAGE BY OVERWINTERING WADERS (CHARADRII) [J].
BRYANT, DM .
ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE SCIENCE, 1979, 9 (04) :369-384
[4]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2
[5]   NONRANDOM SHOREBIRD DISTRIBUTION AND FINE-SCALE VARIATION IN PREY ABUNDANCE [J].
COLWELL, MA ;
LANDRUM, SL .
CONDOR, 1993, 95 (01) :94-103
[6]  
DABORN GR, 1993, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V38, P225
[7]   COMPARISONS OF TREATMENTS AFTER AN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE IN ECOLOGY [J].
DAY, RW ;
QUINN, GP .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1989, 59 (04) :433-463
[8]  
DUFFY DC, 1981, AUK, V98, P215
[9]  
Evans P.R., 1984, P8
[10]   ECOLOGY OF WASH .3. DENSITY-RELATED BEHAVIOR AND POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF A LOSS OF FEEDING GROUNDS ON WADING BIRDS (CHARADRII) [J].
GOSSCUSTARD, JD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1977, 14 (03) :721-739