Optimization of Predictors of Ewing Sarcoma Cause-specific Survival: A Population Study

被引:6
作者
Cheung, Min Rex [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Cyberknife Ctr, Flushing, NY 11354 USA
关键词
SEER; ROC; Ewing; disparity; predictor models; RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; TUMORS; NEOPLASMS; CANCER; CURVE;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.10.4143
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: This study used receiver operating characteristic curve to analyze Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Ewing sarcoma (ES) outcome data. The aim of this study was to identify and optimize ES-specific survival prediction models and sources of survival disparities. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed socio-economic, staging and treatment factors available in the SEER database for ES. 1844 patients diagnosed between 1973-2009 were used for this study. For the risk modeling, each factor was fitted by a Generalized Linear Model to predict the outcome (bone and joint specific death, yes/no). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was computed. Similar strata were combined to construct the most parsimonious models. Results: The mean follow up time (S. D.) was 74.48 (89.66) months. 36% of the patients were female. The mean (S. D.) age was 18.7 (12) years. The SEER staging has the highest ROC (S. D.) area of 0.616 (0.032) among the factors tested. We simplified the 4-layered risk levels (local, regional, distant, un-staged) to a simpler non-metastatic (I and II) versus metastatic (III) versus un-staged model. The ROC area (S. D.) of the 3-tiered model was 0.612 (0.008). Several other biologic factors were also predictive of ES-specific survival, but not the socio-economic factors tested here. Conclusions: ROC analysis measured and optimized the performance of ES survival prediction models. Optimized models will provide a more efficient way to stratify patients for clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:4143 / 4145
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Clinical features and outcomes in patients with Ewing sarcoma and regional lymph node involvement [J].
Applebaum, Mark A. ;
Goldsby, Robert ;
Neuhaus, John ;
DuBois, Steven G. .
PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 59 (04) :617-620
[2]
Using the receiver operating characteristic curve to select pretreatment and pathologic predictors for early and late postprostatectomy PSA failure [J].
Cheung, R ;
Altschuler, MD ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Wein, AJ ;
Whittington, R .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (03) :400-405
[3]
ROC optimization may improve risk stratification of prostate cancer patients [J].
Cheung, R ;
Altschuler, MD ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Wein, AJ ;
Whittington, R .
UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (02) :286-290
[5]
D'Amico AV, 1998, CANCER, V82, P1887, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1887::AID-CNCR11>3.3.CO
[6]
2-T
[7]
Subsequent Neoplasms in 5-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [J].
Friedman, Debra L. ;
Whitton, John ;
Leisenring, Wendy ;
Mertens, Ann C. ;
Hammond, Sue ;
Stovall, Marilyn ;
Donaldson, Sarah S. ;
Meadows, Anna T. ;
Robison, Leslie L. ;
Neglia, Joseph P. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (14) :1083-1095
[8]
THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[9]
Overview of sarcomas in the adolescent and young adult population [J].
Herzog, CE .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2005, 27 (04) :215-218
[10]
Malignant Sarcoma of the Pelvic Bones Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Vary by Histopathology [J].
Jawad, Muhammad Umar ;
Haleem, Abdul Ahad ;
Scully, Sean P. .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (07) :1529-1541