Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals

被引:50
作者
Johnston, DA [1 ]
Brennan, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Diagnost Imaging, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844865
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Wide variations in patient dose for the same type of X-ray examination have been evident from various international dose surveys. Reference dose levels provide a framework to reduce this variability and aid in the optimization of radiation protection. The aim of this study was to establish, for the first time, a baseline for national reference dose levels in Ireland for four of the most common X-ray examinations: chest, abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine. Measurements of entrance surface dose using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) for these four X-ray examinations were performed on 10 patients in each of 16 randomly selected hospitals. This represented 42% of Irish hospitals applicable to this study. Results have shown wide variation of mean hospital doses, from a factor of 3 for an anteroposterior lumbar spine to a factor of 23 for the chest X-ray. The difference between maximum and minimum individual patient dose values varied up to a factor of 75. Reasons for these dose variations were complex but, in general, low tube potential, high mAs and low filtration were associated with high-dose hospitals. This study also demonstrated lower reference dose levels of up to 40% when compared with those established by the UK and the Commission of the European Communities for four out of six projections. Only the chest X-ray exhibited a similar reference level to those established elsewhere. This emphasizes the importance of each country establishing its own reference dose levels that are appropriate to their own radiographic techniques and practices in order to optimize patient protection.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 402
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
*CEC, 1996, 16260EN CEC EUR EUR
[2]
A COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY PRACTICE AND PATIENT EXPOSURE IN BRITAIN, FRANCE AND ITALY [J].
CONTENTO, G ;
MALISAN, MR ;
PADOVANI, R ;
MACCIA, C ;
WALL, BF ;
SHRIMPTON, PC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1988, 61 (722) :143-152
[3]
Dosimetry Working Party of the Institute of physical sciences in medicine, 1992, NAT PROT PAT DOS MEA
[4]
Reference doses and quality in medical imaging [J].
Faulkner, K ;
Corbett, RH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (850) :1001-1002
[5]
HARDEMAAL O, 1992, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V42, P115
[6]
HART D, 1996, NRPBR289
[7]
HENSHAW ET, 1991, QUAL ASSUR HLTH CARE, V2, P213
[8]
HILLIER MC, 1995, QUANTIFICATION UNCER
[9]
*ICRP, 1996, PUBL ICRP, V73
[10]
*ICRP, 1990, PUBL ICRP, V60