Stimulus artifact removal in EMG from muscles adjacent to stimulated muscles

被引:29
作者
Hines, AE
Crago, PE
Chapman, GJ
Billian, C
机构
[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT BIOMED ENGN,APPL NEURAL CONTROL LAB,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT ORTHOPAED,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[3] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT NEUROL,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[4] METROHLTH MED CTR,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
关键词
stimulus artifact; artifact duration; artifact removal techniques; digital processing; EMG recording; electrical stimulation; sample-and-hold technique;
D O I
10.1016/0165-0270(95)00099-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
When stimulating muscles, EMG signals recorded in neighboring muscles can be contaminated by stimulus artifacts, and artifact deletion is necessary. We have devised a digital technique for removing stimulus artifacts from rectified EMG recordings in muscles which lie close to a stimulated muscle. This artifact deletion method replaces the rectified EMG during the artifact interval with an estimate of the rectified EMG, Our research requires detection of very small changes in EMG levels. Therefore, the artifact deletion technique described in this paper was designed to leave less than 10 mu V of artifact in the rectified EMG post-processing. This technique relies on being able to estimate the artifact duration. Since stimulated muscles have M-waves that can overlap with artifacts, our technique is only appropriate for removing artifacts in muscles which are not being stimulated. Unlike other artifact elimination techniques, our technique does not change the mean value of the rectified EMG, regardless of artifact width. In addition, it provides a more accurate a estimate of the rectified EMG during the artifact interval as opposed to sample-and-hold techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   LOW NOISE ALTERNATING CURRENT AMPLIFIER AND COMPENSATOR TO REDUCE STIMULUS ARTEFACT [J].
ANDERSEN, VO ;
BUCHTHAL, F .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1970, 8 (05) :501-&
[2]  
BABB TL, 1978, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V44, P528, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90038-X
[3]   A DIGITAL TECHNIQUE FOR STIMULUS ARTIFACT REDUCTION [J].
BLOGG, T ;
REID, WD .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 76 (06) :557-561
[4]   ELECTRONIC STIMULUS ARTIFACT SUPPRESSOR [J].
FREEMAN, JA .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 31 (02) :170-&
[5]  
HANDA T, 1990, P 12 ANN INT C IEEE, P2273
[6]   A METHOD FOR ELIMINATING THE STIMULUS ARTIFACT FROM DIGITAL RECORDINGS OF THE DIRECT CORTICAL RESPONSE [J].
HARDING, GW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 24 (02) :183-195
[7]  
Hines A. E., 1995, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, V3, P193, DOI 10.1109/86.392368
[8]   IMPROVED ARTIFACT REJECTION AND ISOLATION OF COMPOUND ACTION-POTENTIALS BY MEANS OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION [J].
KISS, I ;
SHIZGAL, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1989, 30 (03) :219-229
[9]   SUPPRESSION OF SIMULATION ARTIFACTS FROM MYOELECTRIC-EVOKED POTENTIAL RECORDINGS [J].
KNAFLITZ, M ;
MERLETTI, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1988, 35 (09) :758-763
[10]   ON THE NATURE AND ELIMINATION OF STIMULUS ARTIFACT IN NERVE SIGNALS EVOKED AND RECORDED USING SURFACE ELECTRODES [J].
MCGILL, KC ;
CUMMINS, KL ;
DORFMAN, LJ ;
BERLIZOT, BB ;
LUETKEMEYER, K ;
NISHIMURA, DG ;
WIDROW, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1982, 29 (02) :129-137