Effect of colloidal goethite and kaolinite on colorimetric phosphate analysis

被引:3
作者
Anderson, SJ
Sanders, KE
Steyer, KJ
机构
[1] Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500060023x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Filtration through 0.45-mu m filters provides a convenient and widely used operational separation between dissolved and particulate P, yet colloidal P is included in the filtrate with true dissolved P. In addition, centrifugation is often used to separate solids from solution during PO4 sorption experiments, but colloids can be present in the supernatant solution. It is not known whether colloid-sorbed PO4 is detected colorimetrically in solutions that have not been pretreated to release colloidal PO4. The objectives of this research were to determine whether colloid-sorbed PO4 is detected colorimetrically and whether the type and size of colloid, the pH during PO4 sorption, or the sorption reaction time affect the extent to which colloid-sorbed PO4 is detected colorimetrically. To accomplish these objectives, 10 mg L(-1) suspensions of 40- to 100-nm and 100- to 450-nm kaolinite and goethite were reacted with sodium phosphate solutions (4, 8, and 16 mu M PO4 at pH 4.5 and 7 in 10 mM NaCl for 1 and 10 d. The concentration of PO4 that was not detected colorimetrically in the presence of colloids (i.e., nonreactive PO4) was calculated as the difference between PO4 in colloid-free blanks and colloid-containing samples, whereas PO4 sorption was measured in samples that had been ultrafiltered through a 4-nm membrane to separate colloids from solution. Nonreactive PO4, which represents the fraction of sorbed PO4 for which desorption kinetics are slow compared with the colorimetric analysis time, ranged from 2% to >35% of total PO4 (P-tot) and from 20 to 100% of sorbed PO4, depending upon P-tot, colloid type, and reaction time. Nonreactive PO4 was about two times greater after 10-d than 1-d reaction and about 1.4 times greater for large than small colloids, even though small colloids sorbed more PO4. Nonreactive PO4 was greater at pH 4.5 than 7 and was greater for goethite than kaolinite. Nonreactive PO4 was independent of P-tot, although sorbed PO4 increased with increasing P-tot. Thus, each type of colloid apparently has a finite capacity to retain sorbed PO4 in nonreactive sites. Because sorbed PO4 is not uniformly detected colorimetrically, accurate quantitation of the colloid-sorbed PO4 will require additional pretreatments such as dissolution of the colloids in strong acid.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1338
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SORPTION AND DESORPTION OF ORTHOPHOSPHATE AND PYROPHOSPHATE BY MINERAL FRACTIONS OF SOILS, GOETHITE, AND KAOLINITE [J].
ALKANANI, T ;
MACKENZIE, AF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (03) :327-338
[2]  
*AM PUBL HLTH ASS, 1989, 4500PF AM PUBL HLTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], J CONT HYDR, DOI DOI 10.1016/0169-7722(87)90011-8
[4]   CRYSTAL NUCLEATION IN FE(3) SOLUTIONS AND HYDRXIDE GELS [J].
ATKINSON, RJ ;
POSNER, AM ;
QUIRK, JP .
JOURNAL OF INORGANIC & NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 1968, 30 (09) :2371-+
[5]   A PARTIAL MODEL FOR THE RATE OF ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION OF PHOSPHATE BY GOETHITE [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
MADRID, L ;
POSNER, AM .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1981, 32 (03) :399-407
[6]   A MECHANISTIC MODEL FOR DESCRIBING THE SORPTION AND DESORPTION OF PHOSPHATE BY SOIL [J].
BARROW, NJ .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1983, 34 (04) :733-750
[7]  
BLACK C. A., 1943, Proceedings. Soil Science Society of America, 1942, V7, P123
[8]   DESCRIBING THE EFFECT OF TIME ON SORPTION OF PHOSPHATE BY IRON AND ALUMINUM HYDROXIDES [J].
BOLAN, NS ;
BARROW, NJ ;
POSNER, AM .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1985, 36 (02) :187-197
[9]   DESORPTION OF PHOSPHATE FROM IRON-OXIDES IN RELATION TO EQUILIBRIUM PH AND POROSITY [J].
CABRERA, F ;
DEARAMBARRI, P ;
MADRID, L ;
TOCA, CG .
GEODERMA, 1981, 26 (03) :203-216
[10]   ON THE MECHANISM OF SPECIFIC PHOSPHATE - ADSORPTION BY HYDROXYLATED MINERAL SURFACES - A REVIEW [J].
GOLDBERG, S ;
SPOSITO, G .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1985, 16 (08) :801-821