Improved bounds on quantum learning algorithms

被引:37
作者
Atici, Alp [1 ]
Servedio, Rocco A.
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Math, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Comp Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
quantum query algorithms; quantum computation; computational learning theory; PAC learning;
D O I
10.1007/s11128-005-0001-2
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In this article we give several new results on the complexity of algorithms that learn Boolean functions from quantum queries and quantum examples. Hunziker et al. [Quantum Information Processing, to appear] conjectured that for any class C of Boolean functions, the number of quantum black-box queries which are required to exactly identify an unknown function from C is O (log vertical bar C vertical bar/root gamma C), where gamma(C) is a combinatorial parameter of the class C. We essentially resolve this conjecture in the affirmative by giving a quantum algorithm that, for any class C, identifies any unknown function front C using O(log vertical bar C vertical bar log log vertical bar C vertical bar/root gamma(C)) quantum black box queries. We consider a range of natural problems intermediate between the exact learning problem (in which the learner must obtain all bits of information about the black-box function) and the usual problem of computing a predicate (in which the learner must obtain only one bit of information about the black-box function). We give positive and negative results on when the quantum and classical query complexities of these intermediate problems are polynomially related to each other. Finally, we improve the known lower bounds on the number of quantum examples (as opposed to quantum black-box queries) required for (epsilon, delta)-PAC learning any concept class of Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension d over the domain {0, 1}(n) front Omega (d/n) to Omega(1/epsilon log 1/delta +d+ root d/epsilon). This new lower bound comes closer to matching known upper bounds for classical PAC learning.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 386
页数:32
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AMBAINIS A, P STACS 2004, P93
[2]  
Angluin D., 1988, Machine Learning, V2, P319, DOI 10.1007/BF00116828
[3]   Quantum lower bounds by polynomials [J].
Beals, R ;
Buhrman, H ;
Cleve, R ;
Mosca, M ;
de Wolf, R .
39TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :352-361
[4]   Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing [J].
Bennett, CH ;
Bernstein, E ;
Brassard, G ;
Vazirani, U .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1997, 26 (05) :1510-1523
[5]   Quantum complexity theory [J].
Bernstein, E ;
Vazirani, U .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1997, 26 (05) :1411-1473
[6]   LEARNABILITY AND THE VAPNIK-CHERVONENKIS DIMENSION [J].
BLUMER, A ;
EHRENFEUCHT, A ;
HAUSSLER, D ;
WARMUTH, MK .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1989, 36 (04) :929-965
[7]  
Boyer M, 1998, FORTSCHR PHYS, V46, P493, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199806)46:4/5<493::AID-PROP493>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]   Learning DNF over the uniform distribution using a quantum example oracle [J].
Bshouty, NH ;
Jackson, JC .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1999, 28 (03) :1136-1153
[10]   Oracles and queries that are sufficient for exact learning [J].
Bshouty, NH ;
Cleve, R ;
Gavalda, R ;
Kannan, S ;
Tamon, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 1996, 52 (03) :421-433