Matched-samples comparison of intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

被引:31
作者
Khan, Naveed [1 ]
Richter, Kevin S. [1 ]
Newsome, Tasha L. [1 ]
Blake, Emily J. [2 ]
Yankov, Vladimir L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shady Grove Fertil Reprod Sci Ctr, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Ferring Pharmaceut Inc, Parsippany, NJ USA
关键词
Vaginal; intramuscular; progesterone; luteal phase support; in vitro fertilization; pregnancy rate; live birth rate; CRINONE; 8-PERCENT; MICRONIZED PROGESTERONE; TRANSFER CYCLES; IVF; GEL; SUPPLEMENTATION; EXPERIENCE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.072
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate vaginal compared to intramuscular (IM) progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Design: Retrospective matched-samples comparative study. Setting: Private infertility center. Patients(s): Two hundred forty patients undergoing IVF-ET. Intervention(s): Patients received either vaginal progesterone supplementation in the form of Endometrin 100 mg twice a day (n = 12), Endometrin 100 mg three times a day (n = 11), or Crinone 8% get 90 mg every day (n = 17), or 50 mg every day IM progesterone in oil (n = 200). Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical intrauterine pregnancy rates, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates. Result(s): Among patients using vaginal progesterone, there were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, regardless of the type of vaginal progesterone used. There were no differences in outcomes between the vaginal and IM progesterone treatment groups. There were 20 pregnancies (50.0%) among patients treated with vaginal progesterone and 103 pregnancies (51.5%) among matched IM progesterone patients. The live birth rates were 47% in the IM versus 47.5% in the vaginal progesterone groups. There were no statistically significant differences in miscarriage rates between groups. Conclusion(s): There are no significant differences in treatment outcomes between vaginal and IM progesterone supplementation, yielding similar clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91: 2445-50. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2445 / 2450
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Use of Crinone* vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles [J].
Chantilis, SJ ;
Zeitoun, KM ;
Patel, SI ;
Johns, DA ;
Madziar, VA ;
McIntire, DD .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (05) :823-829
[2]   OVULATION INDUCTION FOR CORPUS-LUTEUM DEFICIENCY [J].
DAYA, S .
SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1990, 8 (03) :156-164
[3]  
Daya S, 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858
[4]   HORMONAL-CONTROL OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY [J].
DEZIEGLER, D .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (01) :4-7
[5]   Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on luteal function [J].
DiLuigi, Andrea J. ;
Nulsen, John C. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) :258-265
[6]   Endometrin® for luteal phase support in a randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective IVF clinical trial using a combination of Menopur® and Bravelle® [J].
Doody, K. ;
Shamma, N. ;
Paulson, R. ;
Bayer, S. ;
Blake, E. ;
Yankov, V. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 :S24-S24
[7]   Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase may improve the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles [J].
Farhi, J ;
Weissman, A ;
Steinfeld, Z ;
Shorer, M ;
Nahum, H ;
Levran, D .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (04) :761-766
[8]  
FRYDMAN R, 1982, FERTIL STERIL, V38, P312
[9]  
GARCIA J, 1981, FERTIL STERIL, V36, P565
[10]   Experience with a novel vaginal progesterone preparation in a donor oocyte program [J].
Gibbons, WE ;
Toner, JP ;
Hamacher, P ;
Kolm, P .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (01) :96-101