Prostate cancer: Detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging

被引:135
作者
Mullerad, M
Hricak, H
Wang, L
Chen, HN
Kattan, MW
Scardino, PT
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; magnetic resonance (MR); coils; spectroscopy; prostate; biopsy; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2321031254
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader's subspecialty experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and chi(2) tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P <.05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566-0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582-0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P =.019 and.31, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
    Allsbrook, WC
    Mangold, KA
    Johnson, MH
    Lane, RB
    Lane, CG
    Amin, MB
    Bostwick, DG
    Humphrey, PA
    Jones, EC
    Reuter, VE
    Sakr, W
    Sesterhenn, IA
    Troncoso, P
    Wheeler, TM
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [2] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologists
    Allsbrook, WC
    Mangold, KA
    Johnson, MH
    Lane, RB
    Lane, CG
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [3] Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.
    Begg, CB
    Riedel, ER
    Bach, PB
    Kattan, MW
    Schrag, D
    Warren, JL
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) : 1138 - 1144
  • [4] REPORTING THE MISSED RADIOLOGIC-DIAGNOSIS - MEDICOLEGAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BERLIN, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (01) : 183 - 187
  • [5] Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations
    Birkmeyer, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 190 (03) : 341 - 349
  • [6] Multiple measures of carcinoma extent versus perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy tissue in prediction of pathologic stage in a screening population
    Bismar, TA
    Lewis, JS
    Vollmer, RT
    Humphrey, PA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (04) : 432 - 440
  • [7] Bottomley P., 1984, Patent, Patent No. [4480228, 4,480,228]
  • [8] NMR CHEMICAL-SHIFT IMAGING IN 3 DIMENSIONS
    BROWN, TR
    KINCAID, BM
    UGURBIL, K
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (11): : 3523 - 3526
  • [9] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, B
    Schnall, M
    Schultz, D
    Cote, K
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Wein, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) : 759 - 763
  • [10] Dudley RA, 2001, MED CARE, V39, P1182