Peanut resistance to Sclerotinia minor and S-sclerotiorum

被引:12
作者
Cruickshank, AW
Cooper, M
Ryley, MJ
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Primary Ind, Kingaroy, Qld 4610, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Land & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Queensland Dept Primary Ind, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 2002年 / 53卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/AR02013
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The fungi Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum are the causal agents of two similar diseases of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Both diseases cause significant losses in the Australian peanut industry. Development of cultivars with resistance to Sclerotinia will be an important component of integrated control. The aims of this project are to generate information that will assist in breeding for Sclerotinia resistance in peanut: to identify Sclerotinia-resistant peanut germplasm, to understand the inheritance and estimate heritability of resistance, and to test the effectiveness of identified sources of resistance against both S. minor and S. sclerotiorum. This study has clearly established that material that shows resistance to S. minor in the USA is resistant to S. minor and likely to be resistant to S. sclerotiorum in Australia. The high level of resistance to both S. minor and S. sclerotiorum in germplasm from Texas, particularly TxAG-4, was confirmed. VA 93B showed good resistance in the field, which is primarily due to the open bush type rather than physiological resistance. Physiological resistance to S. minor was also identified in a cultivar and a landrace from Indonesia and a rust-resistant line from Queensland. All germplasm found to have high physiological resistance to S. minor belonged to the Spanish type. Inheritance of physiological resistance to S. minor was studied using a Generation Means Analysis (GMA) of the cross TxAG-4/VA 93B and its reciprocal. The broad-sense heritability of physiological resistance on a single plant basis was estimated at 47%, much higher than earlier estimates obtained in field studies. The average gene action of Sclerotinia resistance genes from TxAG-4 was found to be additive. No dominance effects were detected in the GMA. A small but significant reciprocal effect between TxAG-4 and VA 93B indicated that VA 93B passed on some physiological resistance maternally. An experiment was conducted to confirm the value of resistance against both S. minor and S. sclerotiorum. TxAG-4 was found to have physiological resistance to both S. minor and S. sclerotiorum. This resistance was expressed against both Sclerotinia species by progeny that were selected for resistance to S. minor. On the basis of the information obtained, the comparative advantages of 3 strategies for Sclerotinia-resistant cultivar development are discussed: (1) introduction of germplasm; (2) recurrent backcrossing with screening and crossing in the BCnF1 generation; and (3) pedigree selection. At present, introduction and backcrossing are recommended as the preferred strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1110
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ABS, 2001, AUSTR NOW STAT PROF
[2]  
Carley DH., 1995, ADV PEANUT SCI, pp. 554
[3]  
Cavalli L. L., 1952, Quantitative inheritance. Papers read at a colloquium held at the Institute of Animal Genetics Edinburgh University under the auspices of the Agricultural Research Council April 4th to 6th, 1950., P135
[4]   REGISTRATION OF VIRGINIA 81 BUNCH PEANUT [J].
COFFELT, TA ;
PORTER, DM ;
MOZINGO, RW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1982, 22 (05) :1085-1086
[5]   REGISTRATION OF VA-93B PEANUT [J].
COFFELT, TA ;
PORTER, DM ;
MOZINGO, RW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (04) :1126-1126
[6]   REGISTRATION OF 6 PEANUT GERMPLASM LINES WITH MULTIPLE RESISTANCE [J].
COFFELT, TA ;
PORTER, DM ;
SMITH, JC ;
MOZINGO, RW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1987, 27 (06) :1319-1319
[7]  
Crosthwaite I., 1994, PEANUT GROWING AUSTR
[8]  
CRUICKSHANK AW, 2001, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
[9]  
DOW R L, 1988, Peanut Science, V15, P1, DOI 10.3146/i0095-3679-15-1-1
[10]   EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS ON SCLEROTINIA-MINOR AND SCLEROTINIA BLIGHT OF PEANUT [J].
DOW, RL ;
PORTER, DM ;
POWELL, NL .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1988, 78 (06) :672-676