Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy-A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:227
作者
Jin, Chu [2 ]
Hu, Yan [1 ]
Chen, Xia-chan [3 ]
Zheng, Fei-yun [1 ]
Lin, Feng [1 ]
Zhou, Kai [1 ]
Chen, Feng-di [1 ]
Gu, Hang-zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou Med Coll, Dept Gynecol, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Coll, Sch Informat & Engn, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Runan Peoples Hosp, Dept Med, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Myomectomy; Meta-analysis; ABDOMINAL MYOMECTOMY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RECURRENCE RATE; COMPLICATIONS; SUBSEQUENT; PREGNANCY; FERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the better method of myomectomy by comparing laparoscopic and open myomectomy for patients with fibroids with regard to operative parameters and outcomes. A systematic review was performed on published studies identified by the databases PubMed, EMBASE, the China Biological Medicine Datadase (CBMdisc), Ovid and the Cochrane Library, as well as cross-references. Randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic versus open myomectomy were assessed on operative parameters and outcomes. Six studies and 576 patients were studied. Analysis was performed using the statistical software Review Manager Version 4.2. The data available show that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with less hemoglobin drop, reduced operative blood loss, more patients fully recuperated at day 15, diminished postoperative pain, and fewer overall complications but longer operation time. However, major complications, pregnancy and recurrence were comparable in the two groups. The data show that if performed by suitably specialized surgeons in selected patients, laparoscopic myomectomy is a better choice than open surgery. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minitaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas
    Alessandri, F
    Lijoi, D
    Mistrangelo, E
    Ferrero, S
    Ragni, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [2] Skill acquisition in resuscitation
    Bullock, I
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2000, 45 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [3] Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology.: Results of a meta-analysis
    Chapron, C
    Fauconnier, A
    Goffinet, F
    Bréart, G
    Dubuisson, JB
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (05) : 1334 - 1342
  • [4] Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases
    Chapron, C
    Querleu, D
    Bruhat, MA
    Madelenat, P
    Fernandez, H
    Pierre, F
    Dubuisson, JB
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (04) : 867 - 872
  • [5] Bringing it all together:: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews
    Clarke, M
    Horton, R
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9270) : 1728 - 1728
  • [6] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [7] Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy
    Fauconnier, A
    Chapron, C
    Babaki-Fard, K
    Dubuisson, JB
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2000, 6 (06) : 595 - 602
  • [8] A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications
    HarkkiSiren, P
    Kurki, T
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: A double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain
    Holzer, A
    Jirecek, ST
    Illievich, UM
    Huber, J
    Wenzl, RJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (05) : 1480 - 1484
  • [10] Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
    Jadad, AR
    Moore, RA
    Carroll, D
    Jenkinson, C
    Reynolds, DJM
    Gavaghan, DJ
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01): : 1 - 12