A conceptual framework for the definition of the optimal width of riparian forests

被引:47
作者
Sparovek, G
Ranieri, SBL
Gassner, A
De Maria, IC
Schnug, E
dos Santos, RF
Joubert, A
机构
[1] Fed Agr Res Ctr, Inst Plant Nutr & Soil Sci, FAL, PB, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[3] Inst Agron Estado Sao Paulo, IAC, BR-13001970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
riparian forest; sediment yield; WEPP; GIS; Brazil;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00195-5
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Riparian ecosystems, often represented by riparian forests (RFs), are diverse systems which are being endangered primarily from the expansion of agricultural land and are protected by legislation in recognition of their role in preserving water resources. The methods usually employed to recommend maintenance or reclamation of RFs fail in not considering the full costs and benefits. In agroecosystems, the preservation of RFs will result in a permanent improvement in freshwater quality, but will also remove economically attractive space from crop production. This paper describes the principles of a procedure which uses data that is usually available (topographic maps, land use and soil data) to determine the optimal RF width, quantitatively and on a geo-referenced basis. An example, based on land-use scenarios representative of southeast Brazil is used to illustrate the suggested framework. Because of the simultaneous analysis of variables related to target effects on water quality, the effectiveness of the RF in retaining sediments and the forests capability for developing the multifunctional aspects of a riparian ecosystem could be considered. For the case study, the optimal RF width was calculated as 52 in, resulting in a sediment yield value of 12 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) and a retention of 54% of the total amount of sediments. This RF width was wider and more efficient if compared with the official legal recommendation of 30 m. The decision process is logically based and the equations clearly described, and thus can be incorporated in Geographic Information Systems. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The World's Water 1998-1999: The Biennial Report on Fresh Water Resources
[2]   RIPARIAN AREAS AS FILTERS FOR AGRICULTURAL SEDIMENT [J].
COOPER, JR ;
GILLIAM, JW ;
DANIELS, RB ;
ROBARGE, WP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1987, 51 (02) :416-420
[3]  
Flanagan D., 1995, USDA WATER EROSION P
[4]  
FLANAGAN DC, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P2001
[5]   RIPARIAN WETLANDS AND WATER-QUALITY [J].
GILLIAM, JW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1994, 23 (05) :896-900
[6]   WATER-RESOURCES AND LAND-WATER INTERFACE [J].
KARR, JR ;
SCHLOSSER, IJ .
SCIENCE, 1978, 201 (4352) :229-234
[7]   Water quality functions of Riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds [J].
Lowrance, R ;
Altier, LS ;
Newbold, JD ;
Schnabel, RR ;
Groffman, PM ;
Denver, JM ;
Correll, DL ;
Gilliam, JW ;
Robinson, JL ;
Brinsfield, RB ;
Staver, KW ;
Lucas, W ;
Todd, AH .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 21 (05) :687-712
[8]   Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties [J].
Matson, PA ;
Parton, WJ ;
Power, AG ;
Swift, MJ .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) :504-509
[9]   River management - What's best on the banks? [J].
Montgomery, DR .
NATURE, 1997, 388 (6640) :328-329
[10]  
Nicks A., 1995, USDA WATER EROSION P