Riding the saddle: How cross-market communications can create a major slump in sales

被引:142
作者
Goldenberg, J [1 ]
Libai, B
Muller, E
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sch Business Adm, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Davidson Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Leon Recanati Grad Sch Business Adm, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.66.2.1.18472
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using data on a large number of innovative products in the consumer electronics industry, the authors find that between one-third and one-half of the sales cases involved the following pattern: an initial peak, then a trough of sufficient depth and duration to exclude random fluctuations, and eventually sales levels that exceeded the initial peak. This newly identified pattern, which the authors call a "saddle," is explained by the dual-market phenomenon that differentiates between early market adopters and main market adopters as two separate markets. If these two segments-the early market and the main market-adopt at different rates, and if this difference is pronounced, then the overall sales to the two markets will exhibit a temporary decline at the intermediate stage. The authors employ both empirical analysis and cellular automata, an individual-level, complex system modeling technique for generating and analyzing data, to investigate the conditions under which a saddle occurs. The model highlights the importance of cross-market communication in determining the existence of a saddle. At low levels of this parameter, more than 50% of the cases of new product growth involved a saddle. This percentage gradually decreased as the parameter increased, and at values close to the within-market parameters, the proportion of saddle occurrences dropped below 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adami C, 1998, Introduction to Artificial Life
[2]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, P ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) :604-633
[3]   Complexity theory and organization science [J].
Anderson, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (03) :216-232
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1966, THEORY SELF REPRODUC
[5]  
BIBB P, 1976, CB BIBLE
[6]  
BONNETT J, 1985, MANAGEMENT TODA 1215, pR30
[7]  
Brown L.A., 1981, INNOVATION DIFFUSION
[8]  
Burks A.W., 1970, Essays on Cellular Automata
[9]  
Casti J., 1989, ALTERNATE REALITIES
[10]  
Casti JL, 1996, WOULD BE WORLDS SIMU