Factors affecting transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Latin American and Caribbean countries: An LMDI decomposition analysis

被引:119
作者
Timilsina, Govinda R. [1 ]
Shrestha, Ashish [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Dev Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
transport sector CO2 emissions; decomposition analysis; Latin American and Caribbean countries; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; ENERGY USE; CARBON EMISSIONS; POWER SECTOR; INTENSITY; TRENDS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; DYNAMICS; FREIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/er.1486
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study determines the factors responsible for the growth of transport sector CO2 emissions in 20 Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries during the 1980-2005 period by decomposing the emissions growth into components associated with changes in fuel mix (FM), modal shift and economic growth, as well as changes in emission coefficients (EC) and transportation energy intensity (EI). The key finding of the study is that economic growth and the changes in transportation El are the principal factors driving transport sector CO2 emission growth in the countries considered. While economic growth is responsible for the increasing trend of transport sector CO2 emissions in Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Peru and Uruguay, the transportation El effect is driving CO2 emissions in Bolivia, the Caribbean, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Other Latin America, Panama and Paraguay. Both economic activity (EA) and El effects are found responsible for transport sector CO2 emissions growth in the rest of the Latin American countries. In order to limit CO2 emissions from the transportation sector in LAC countries, decoupling of the growth of CO2 emissions from economic growth is necessary; this can be done through policy instruments to promote fuel switching, modal shifting and reductions in transport sector EI. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 414
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Analysis of aggregate electricity intensity change of the Jordanian industrial sector using decomposition technique [J].
Al-Ghandoor, A. ;
Jaber, J. O. ;
Samhouri, M. ;
Al-Hinti, I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (03) :255-266
[2]   The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :867-871
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]   A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation [J].
Ang, BW ;
Liu, FL .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (06) :537-548
[5]   Decomposition of energy and CO2 intensities of Thai industry between 1981 and 2000 [J].
Bhattacharyya, SC ;
Ussanarassamee, A .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (05) :765-781
[6]   Structural decomposition of industrial CO2 emission in Taiwan:: An input-output approach [J].
Chang, YF ;
Lin, SJ .
ENERGY POLICY, 1998, 26 (01) :5-12
[7]   Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector [J].
Diakoulaki, D. ;
Mandaraka, M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (04) :636-664
[8]  
Diakoulaki D, 2006, ENERGY, V31, P2638, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.024
[9]   Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission intensity between oilproducing and non-oll-producing sub-Saharan African countries [J].
Ebohon, Obas John ;
Ikeme, Anthony Jekwu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3599-3611
[10]  
EIA, 2007, INT EN OUTL 2007